Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33528865›Full record

ReviewDepression and anxiety2021

Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: Canadian expert consensus on definition and assessment.

Yuri E Rybak, Ka S P Lai, Rajamannar Ramasubbu, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Daniel M Blumberger, Peter Chan, Nicholas Delva, Peter Giacobbe, Caroline Gosselin, Sidney H Kennedy and 6 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Depression and anxiety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Treatment-resistant Depression in the Post-ketamine Era: Unmet Needs beyond Rapid Response.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yuri E RybakDepartment of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ka S P LaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7650-6356
Rajamannar RamasubbuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Fidel Vila-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Daniel M BlumbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter ChanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nicholas DelvaDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Peter GiacobbeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline GosselinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sidney H KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hani IskandarDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Shane McInerneyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paula RavitzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Verinder SharmaDepartment of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ari ZaretskyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amer M BurhanOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9888-008X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a debilitating chronic mental illness that confers increased morbidity and mortality, decreases the quality of life, impairs occupational, social, and offspring development, and translates into increased costs on the healthcare system. The goal of this study is to reach an agreement on the concept, definition, staging model, and assessment of TRD.

methodsThis study involved a review of the literature and a modified Delphi process for consensus agreement. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II guidelines were followed for the literature appraisal. Literature was assessed for quality and strength of evidence using the grading, assessment, development, and evaluations system. Canadian national experts in depression were invited for the modified Delphi process based on their prior clinical and research expertize. Survey items were considered to have reached a consensus if 80% or more of the experts supported the statement.

resultsFourteen Canadian experts were recruited for three rounds of surveys to reach a consensus on a total of 27 items. Experts agreed that a dimensional definition for treatment resistance was a useful concept to describe the heterogeneity of this illness. The use of staging models and clinical scales was recommended in evaluating depression. Risk factors and comorbidities were identified as potential predictors for treatment resistance.

conclusionsTRD is a meaningful concept both for clinical practice and research. An operational definition for TRD will allow for opportunities to improve the validity of predictors and therapeutic options for these patients.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantMajor Depressive DisorderCanadaConsensusHumansQuality of LifeCanadacomorbidityconsensusdepressiondepressive disordermajor depressive disorderrisk factorstreatment resistant

Identifiers

PMID33528865
PMCPMC8049072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.