Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33528837›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2021

A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals.

Carys L Mitchelmore, Emily E Burns, Annaleise Conway, Andrew Heyes, Iain A Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review of ultraviolet filters and their impact on aquatic environments.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Sunscreens: A narrative review.Skin health and disease · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The effects of UV filters on health and the environment.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Development of a Survey of Sunscreen Use and Attitudes among Adults in Two Coastal States, 2019.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carys L MitchelmoreUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1373-4479
Emily E BurnsPersonal Care Products Council, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4236-6409
Annaleise ConwayUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland, USA.
Andrew HeyesUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland, USA.
Iain A DaviesPersonal Care Products Council, Washington, DC, USA.
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a rapid increase in public, political, and scientific interest regarding the impact of organic ultraviolet (UV) filters to coral reefs. Such filters are found in sunscreens and other consumer products and enter the aquatic environment via direct (i.e., recreational activities, effluents) or indirect (i.e., land runoff) pathways. This review summarizes the current state of the science regarding the concentration of organic UV filters in seawater and sediment near coral reef ecosystems and in coral tissues, toxicological data from early and adult life stages of coral species, and preliminary environmental risk characterizations. Up to 14 different organic UV filters in seawater near coral reefs have been reported across 12 studies, with the majority of concentrations in the nanograms per liter range. Nine papers report toxicological findings from no response to a variety of biological effects occurring in the micrograms per liter to milligrams per liter range, in part given the wide variations in experimental design and coral species and/or life stage used. This review presents key findings; scientific data gaps; flaws in assumptions, practice, and inference; and a number of recommendations for future studies to assess the environmental risk of organic UV filters to coral reef ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:967-988. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

AnthozoaAnimalsCoral ReefsEcosystemSeawaterSunscreening AgentsSunscreening AgentsCoralsEnvironmental chemistryHazard/risk assessmentPersonal care productsSunscreenUV filters

Identifiers

PMID33528837
PMCPMC8048829
OpenAlexW3127360174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.