Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33528810›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?

T Gupta, M Maitre, P Maitre, J S Goda, R Krishnatry, A Chatterjee, A Moiyadi, P Shetty, S Epari, A Sahay and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India. tejpalgupta@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9206
M MaitreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
P MaitreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
J S GodaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
R KrishnatryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
A ChatterjeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
A MoiyadiDepartment of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
P ShettyDepartment of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
S EpariDepartment of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
A SahayDepartment of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
V PatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
R JalaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors of salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent/progressive glioma.

methodsMedical records of patients treated with high-dose re-RT as part of multi-modality salvage therapy for recurrence/progression of adult diffuse glioma from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.

resultsA total of 111 patients developing recurrent/progressive high-grade glioma after adequate upfront treatment at initial diagnosis were included. The first course of radiotherapy (RT) had been delivered to a median dose of 59.4 Gy with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 54-60 Gy. Median time to recurrence/progression was 4.3 years (IQR = 2.3-7.4 years) while the median time to re-RT was 4.8 years (IQR = 3.6-7.9 years). Re-RT was delivered with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using 1.8 Gy/fraction to a median dose of 54 Gy (IQR = 50.4-55.8 Gy) for a cumulative median equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) of 104.3 Gy (IQR = 102.6-109.4 Gy). At a median follow-up of 14 months after re-RT, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of post-re-RT progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 42.8 and 61.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified histological grade at recurrence/progression; histological subtype; disease-free interval (DFI) and time interval between both courses of RT; performance status at re-RT; dose at re-RT and cumulative EQD2; isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation; and O

conclusionThis clinical audit reports encouraging survival outcomes and identifies key prognostic factors associated with high-dose salvage re-RT in recurrent/progressive glioma.

Indexed as

Re-IrradiationAdolescentAdultBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapySurvival RateGliomaPrognosticRecurrenceRe-irradiationSalvageSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33528810
OpenAlexW3128602730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.