ArticlePsychometrika2021
A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
Article in Psychometrika, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- avbirt: A Python Package for Flexible Item Factor Analysis with Adversarial Variational Bayes.Applied psychological measurement · 2026Article
- Beyond composite scores in chronotype assessment: item-level predictive patterns in the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- A RECURSIVE STOCHASTIC ALGORITHM FOR REAL-TIME ONLINE PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY: ENHANCING COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY FOR DYNAMIC EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Generative Adversarial Networks for High-Dimensional Item Factor Analysis: A Deep Adversarial Learning Algorithm.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Identification and Interpretation of the Completely Oblique Rasch Bifactor Model.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Handling missing data in variational autoencoder based item response theory.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025Article
- Corrected goodness-of-fit index in latent variable modeling using non-parametric bootstrapping.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- A neural network paradigm for modeling psychometric data and estimating IRT model parameters: Cross estimation network.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Variational Autoencoders for Modeling Nonlinear Relationships in Psychological Data.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Model Implied Instrumental Variable Approach to Exploratory Factor Analysis (MIIV-EFA).Psychometrika · 2024Article
- A Note on Improving Variational Estimation for Multidimensional Item Response Theory.Psychometrika · 2024Article
- Artificial Neural Networks for Short-Form Development of Psychometric Tests: A Study on Synthetic Populations Using Autoencoders.Educational and psychological measurement · 2024Article
- Transformers deep learning models for missing data imputation: an application of the ReMasker model on a psychometric scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Accelerating item factor analysis on GPU with Python package xifa.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- PDC: Pearl Detection with a Counter Based on Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Estimating three- and four-parameter MIRT models with importance-weighted sampling enhanced variational auto-encoder.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Exploring Factor Structures Using Variational Autoencoder in Personality Research.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation is the preferred approach to fitting item response theory models in psychometrics due to the MML estimator's consistency, normality, and efficiency as the sample size tends to infinity. However, state-of-the-art MML estimation procedures such as the Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro (MH-RM) algorithm as well as approximate MML estimation procedures such as variational inference (VI) are computationally time-consuming when the sample size and the number of latent factors are very large. In this work, we investigate a deep learning-based VI algorithm for exploratory item factor analysis (IFA) that is computationally fast even in large data sets with many latent factors. The proposed approach applies a deep artificial neural network model called an importance-weighted autoencoder (IWAE) for exploratory IFA. The IWAE approximates the MML estimator using an importance sampling technique wherein increasing the number of importance-weighted (IW) samples drawn during fitting improves the approximation, typically at the cost of decreased computational efficiency. We provide a real data application that recovers results aligning with psychological theory across random starts. Via simulation studies, we show that the IWAE yields more accurate estimates as either the sample size or the number of IW samples increases (although factor correlation and intercepts estimates exhibit some bias) and obtains similar results to MH-RM in less time. Our simulations also suggest that the proposed approach performs similarly to and is potentially faster than constrained joint maximum likelihood estimation, a fast procedure that is consistent when the sample size and the number of items simultaneously tend to infinity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33528784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.