Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33528647›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in the era of COVID-19: responding to different levels of epidemic pressure.

Jean-François Korobelnik, Anat Loewenstein, Bora Eldem, Antonia M Joussen, Adrian Koh, George N Lambrou, Paolo Lanzetta, Xiaoxin Li, Monica Lövestam-Adrian, Rafael Navarro and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave on the care and treatment situation of intravitreal injections in a German metropolitan region.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Effects of COVID-19 on Intravitreal Injection Clinic After Lockdown.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Modifications of intravitreal injections in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021
    Review
  10. Communicating with patients requiring anti-VEGF intravitreal injections and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic: an update.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jean-François KorobelnikService d'ophtalmologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. jean-francois.korobelnik@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4438-9535
Anat LoewensteinDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bora EldemDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Antonia M JoussenCharité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Adrian KohEye and Retina Surgeons, Camden Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
George N LambrouGlobal Medical Affairs Ophthalmology, Bayer, Basel, Switzerland.
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-141X
Xiaoxin LiEye Center and Eye Institute, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Monica Lövestam-AdrianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Rafael NavarroInstituto Microcirugia Ocular, Barcelona, Spain.
Annabelle A OkadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-8962
Ian PearceRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Francisco J RodríguezFundación Oftalmologia Nacional, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-3444
David T WongUnity Health Toronto-St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lihteh WuMacula, Vitreous and Retina Associates of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-7058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFollowing the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, the easing of strict measures to reduce its spread has led to a resurgence of cases in many countries at both the national and local level. This article addresses how guidance for ophthalmologists on managing patients with retinal disease receiving intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) during the pandemic should be adapted to the local epidemic pressure, with more or less stringent measures implemented according to the ebb and flow of the pandemic.

methodsThe Vision Academy's membership of international retinal disease experts analyzed guidance for anti-VEGF intravitreal injections during the COVID-19 pandemic and graded the recommendations according to three levels of increasing epidemic pressure. The revised recommendations were discussed, refined, and voted on by the 14-member Vision Academy Steering Committee for consensus.

resultsProtocols to minimize the exposure of patients and healthcare staff to COVID-19, including use of personal protective equipment, physical distancing, and hygiene measures, should be routinely implemented and intensified according to local infection rates and pressure on the hospital/clinic or healthcare system. In areas with many COVID-19-positive clusters, additional measures including pre-screening of patients, postponement of non-urgent appointments, and simplification of complex intravitreal anti-VEGF regimens should be considered. Treatment prioritization for those at greatest risk of irreversible vision loss should be implemented in areas where COVID-19 cases are increasing exponentially and healthcare resources are strained.

conclusionConsistency in monitoring of local infection rates and adjustment of clinical practice accordingly will be required as we move forward through the COVID-19 era. Ophthalmologists must continue to carefully weigh the risk-benefits to minimize the exposure of patients and healthcare staff to COVID-19, ensure that patients receive sight-saving treatment, and avoid the potential long-term impact of prolonged treatment postponement.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Angiogenesis InhibitorsCOVID-19Disease Transmission, InfectiousHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPersonal Protective EquipmentPractice Guidelines as TopicRetinal DiseasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanCoronavirusCOVID-19OphthalmologyRecommendationsRetinal diseaseVision Academy

Identifiers

PMID33528647
PMCPMC7852054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.