ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021
Enhancing patient safety through the quality assured use of a low-tech video interpreting system to overcome language barriers in healthcare settings.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological translation tools for official language minorities in primary and emergency care: A rapid scoping review and environmental scan.The European journal of general practice · 2026Article
- Psychological and health consequences of difficult-to-translate concepts among immigrant older adults.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- "Ich verstehe es nicht": the necessity of integrating professional interpretation into the German healthcare system.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Article
- A qualitative study exploring the use of interpreters in a healthcare setting for children and young people seeking asylum and refugees.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Working experiences of remote interpreters in health care settings-insights from Austria and Germany.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Navigating Complexities In Randomized Trials: Insights From The EMERGE Trial Amidst Pandemic And Cybersecurity Threat.HRB open research · 2025Article
- Prohibiting Babel-A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Video-Based Concept for Hand Hygiene Education of Parents in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Access to the Health Care System of Undocumented Moroccan Migrant Slum Dwellers in Southern Spain: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Language Access Systems Improvement initiative: impact on professional interpreter utilisation, a natural experiment.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The Perception of Nurses about Migrants after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Close Contact Improves the Relationship.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Perspectives of Healthcare Providers towards Remote Medical Interpreting Services in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Employer impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among nursing and social care employees in Austria.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Professional interpretation and translation are key issues in the improvement of public health and patient safety in an area of increased migration and multicultural healthcare system needs. Patient safety requires clear and reliable communication to avoid errors in diagnosis, treatment, and neglect of informed consent. Due to the range of languages to be covered, telephone and video interpretation (VI) can be expected to face up to the demands for trained interpreters available on short notice and in more remote healthcare sites.In a pilot project, we implemented a new up to date model video interpretation unit and used a mixed methods approach integrating quantitative and qualitative data in assessing barriers encountered prior to the use of the pilot system and satisfaction with the use of video interpretation in a number of clinical settings, including inpatient and outpatient units, in Austria. Of all respondents (n = 144) 71% reported frequently encountering language barriers, only 37% reported the use of professional interpreters, 81% reported using siblings, parents or other non-professional interpreters, while a considerable percentage (66%) reported using gestures or drawings to communicate, resulting in very low overall satisfaction rate (only 12%) with the prior situation.In the qualitative study the users observed rapid availability, data protection compliance, ability to see the interpreter despite physical distance, absence of potential external influence resulting from personal relationships, user-friendly nature of the technique, legal certainty, absence of the requirement for personal presence, and cost savings as key benefits in the use of the new technology. Of the users of the system 88% (n = 58) rated it as very good (72%) or good (16%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.