Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33528370›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Hidden Variables in Deep Learning Digital Pathology and Their Potential to Cause Batch Effects: Prediction Model Study.

Max Schmitt, Roman Christoph Maron, Achim Hekler, Albrecht Stenzinger, Axel Hauschild, Michael Weichenthal, Markus Tiemann, Dieter Krahl, Heinz Kutzner, Jochen Sven Utikal and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Explainability and causability in digital pathology.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Max Schmitt *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5133-6768
Roman Christoph Maron *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2120-901X
Achim HeklerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-2457
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1001-103X
Axel HauschildDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-9587
Michael WeichenthalDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9060-4961
Markus TiemannInstitute for Hematopathology Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-8355
Dieter KrahlPrivate Institute of Dermatopathology, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6321-1441
Heinz KutznerPrivate Institute of Dermatopathology, Friedrichshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-3050
Jochen Sven UtikalSkin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-0241
Sebastian HaferkampDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3894-8345
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medicine III, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-5348
Frederick KlauschenInstitute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9131-2389
Eva Krieghoff-HenningDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8381-3100
Stefan FröhlingNational Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-0808
Christof von KalleDepartment of Clinical-Translational Sciences, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-3297
Titus Josef BrinkerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-5919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of studies within digital pathology show the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to diagnose cancer using histological whole slide images, which requires large and diverse data sets. While diversification may result in more generalizable AI-based systems, it can also introduce hidden variables. If neural networks are able to distinguish/learn hidden variables, these variables can introduce batch effects that compromise the accuracy of classification systems.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to analyze the learnability of an exemplary selection of hidden variables (patient age, slide preparation date, slide origin, and scanner type) that are commonly found in whole slide image data sets in digital pathology and could create batch effects.

methodsWe trained four separate convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn four variables using a data set of digitized whole slide melanoma images from five different institutes. For robustness, each CNN training and evaluation run was repeated multiple times, and a variable was only considered learnable if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of its mean balanced accuracy was above 50.0%.

resultsA mean balanced accuracy above 50.0% was achieved for all four tasks, even when considering the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval. Performance between tasks showed wide variation, ranging from 56.1% (slide preparation date) to 100% (slide origin).

conclusionsBecause all of the analyzed hidden variables are learnable, they have the potential to create batch effects in dermatopathology data sets, which negatively affect AI-based classification systems. Practitioners should be aware of these and similar pitfalls when developing and evaluating such systems and address these and potentially other batch effect variables in their data sets through sufficient data set stratification.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansPathologyartifactsartificial intelligenceclinical pathologyconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdigital pathologymachine learningneural networkspathologypitfalls

Identifiers

PMID33528370
PMCPMC7886613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.