Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33527998›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022

Penalized model-based clustering of fMRI data.

Andrew Dilernia, Karina Quevedo, Jazmin Camchong, Kelvin Lim, Wei Pan, Lin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Group-level comparison of brain connectivity networks.BMC medical research methodology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew DilerniaDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Karina QuevedoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jazmin CamchongDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kelvin LimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lin ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Effects of Neuromodulation and Cognitive Training on Brain Networks Associated with Relapse in Alcohol Use DisorderK01AA026349 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAMCHONG, Y. JAZMIN · 2018 to 2022
$833k
A random covariance model for bi-level graphical model inference with application to fMRI data analysis of adolescents with highsuicidal riskR03MH115300 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZHANG, LIN · 2017 to 2018
$145k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026349NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH115300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have become increasingly available and are useful for describing functional connectivity (FC), the relatedness of neuronal activity in regions of the brain. This FC of the brain provides insight into certain neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders, and thus is of clinical importance. To help inform physicians regarding patient diagnoses, unsupervised clustering of subjects based on FC is desired, allowing the data to inform us of groupings of patients based on shared features of connectivity. Since heterogeneity in FC is present even between patients within the same group, it is important to allow subject-level differences in connectivity, while still pooling information across patients within each group to describe group-level FC. To this end, we propose a random covariance clustering model (RCCM) to concurrently cluster subjects based on their FC networks, estimate the unique FC networks of each subject, and to infer shared network features. Although current methods exist for estimating FC or clustering subjects using fMRI data, our novel contribution is to cluster or group subjects based on similar FC of the brain while simultaneously providing group- and subject-level FC network estimates. The competitive performance of RCCM relative to other methods is demonstrated through simulations in various settings, achieving both improved clustering of subjects and estimation of FC networks. Utility of the proposed method is demonstrated with application to a resting-state fMRI data set collected on 43 healthy controls and 61 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSchizophreniaBrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisHumansBrain connectivityfMRIGaussian graphical modelsMachine learningModel-based clusteringNeuroimagingSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33527998
PMCPMC9293048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.