Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33527673›Full record

SynthesisDermatologic therapy2021

Patient-reported outcomes of topical therapies in actinic keratosis: A systematic review.

Ayman Grada, Steven R Feldman, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Giovanni Damiani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dermatologic therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Profile of Tirbanibulin for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Tirbanibulin for Actinic Keratosis: Insights into the Mechanism of Action.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayman GradaR&D and Medical Affairs, Almirall (US), Exton, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5321-0584
Steven R FeldmanDepartment of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Nicola Luigi BragazziDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Giovanni DamianiClinical Dermatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-6505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' perspectives on actinic keratosis treatments may have an impact on treatment adherence and, therefore, therapeutic outcomes. We performed a systematic review to assess patients' perspectives of topical, field-directed treatments for actinic keratoses. A literature search was conducted, and 14 studies were identified encompassing 4433 patients. Only four studies were focused on face and/or scalp, which are the locations that typically impact patients' quality of life. Four studies were clinical trials. One study utilized a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instrument specifically developed for actinic keratosis. In general, treatment adherence and patient satisfaction were better with shorter-duration treatment regimens such as ingenol mebutate gel. Imiquimod improved quality of life in one study but not in another. No data was available on topical piroxicam. The findings underscore the need for effective and well-tolerated, short-duration topical treatment for actinic keratosis.

Indexed as

DiterpenesKeratosis, ActinicHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDiterpenesactinic keratosisadherencecompliancepatient-reported outcomessafetysystematic reviewtolerabilitytopical

Identifiers

PMID33527673
PMCPMC8047920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.