Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33527654›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

INTERVENE-HF: feasibility study of individualized, risk stratification-based, medication intervention in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Michael R Zile, Maria Rosa R Costanzo, Ekaterina M Ippolito, Yan Zhang, Russell Stapleton, Ashish Sadhu, Javier Jimenez, Joe Hobbs, Vinod Sharma, Eduardo N Warman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R ZileRJH Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-221X
Maria Rosa R CostanzoAdvocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL, USA.
Ekaterina M IppolitoMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Yan ZhangMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Russell StapletonBaptist Health, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ashish SadhuHeart and Vascular Center of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Javier JimenezSouth Miami Heart Specialists, South Miami, FL, USA.
Joe HobbsMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Vinod SharmaMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Eduardo N WarmanMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lindsay StreeterMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Javed ButlerUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USA.
Medtronic (United States) · USAdvocate Heart Institute · USArizona Heart Institute · USBaptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMiami Heart Research Institute · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDetermine the feasibility of implementing a heart failure (HF) management strategy that (i) uses a device-based, remote, dynamic, multimetric risk stratification model to predict the risk of HF events and (ii) uses a standardized, centrally administered, ambulatory medication intervention protocol to reproducibly and safely decrease elevated risk scores. METHODS AND

resultsProspective, non-randomized, single-arm, multicenter feasibility study (Intervene-HF) was conducted in HF patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardio defibrillator (CRT-D) with TriageHF risk score feature. Certified HF nurses (CHFN) in the Medtronic Care Management Services Program implemented an ambulatory medication intervention strategy by following a standardized guided action pathway triggered by risk-based alert. When CHFN received notification of increased risk score (HF care alert), they implemented a 3 day course of diuretic up-titration (PRN) previously prescribed by a physician. Safety was monitored daily. Recovery after PRN was defined as ≥70% recovery of impedance toward baseline levels. Sixty-six patients followed for 8.2 ± 3.9 months had 49 HF care alerts. Twenty-three of 49 alerts did not receive PRN due to protocol-mandated criteria. Twenty-six of 49 alerts received PRN, 22 were completed, and 19 led to impedance recovery. Four interventions were stopped for safety without leading to an adverse event (AE). One of 26 PRNs was followed by a HF event. Eighty-five per cent (22/26) of PRNs were completed without an AE; 69% (18/26) met the recovery criteria.

conclusionsThe Intervene-HF study supports the feasibility of testing, in a large randomized clinical trial, an ambulatory medication intervention strategy that is physician-directed, CHFN-implemented, and based on individualized device risk stratification.

Indexed as

Heart FailureFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentStroke VolumeCongestiveHeart failureRemote metric

Identifiers

PMID33527654
PMCPMC8006696
OpenAlexW3128859706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.