Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33527526›Full record

ArticleMycoses2021

Performance evaluation of fungal DNA PCR amplification from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for diagnosis: Experience of a tertiary reference laboratory.

Colleen Lysen, Luciana Silva-Flannery, Sherif R Zaki, Joy M Gary, Shawn R Lockhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycoses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A New Duplex PCR-Assay for the Detection and Identification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen LysenMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Luciana Silva-FlanneryInfectious Disease Pathology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sherif R ZakiInfectious Disease Pathology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joy M GaryInfectious Disease Pathology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shawn R LockhartMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-5994
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of invasive fungal infections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues by PCR amplification is a developing technology. One of the difficulties of establishing a validated protocol for this testing is that the gold standard, culture, is much less sensitive than the test being validated.

objectivesTo validate FFPE PCR as a refence laboratory identification methodology in the absence of abundant gold standard specimens.

methodsIn this validation, PCR from FFPE tissue was compared to other diagnostic methods for genus/species identification. Four different groups of correlative data from FFPE tissues were used to validate this procedure. Thirteen specimens had culture or serology results and FFPE PCR results, 49 specimens had both immunohistochemistry (IHC) identification and FFPE PCR results, 118 specimens had histological evidence of fungal elements, 64 of which also had FFPE PCR results, and 36 fungal mock tissues or fungal negative tissues were used.

resultsThe sensitivity determined from the tissues with positive fungal histopathology was 54%. The specificity of the cases for which there were both culture and FFPE PCR results was 100%. For the correlation with IHC, the specificity was 98%. For the mock tissues and fungal negative tissues, the calculated analytical sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 95%, and accuracy was 94%.

conclusionsBy uniquely combining various data sources, this study provides a comprehensive framework for how validation can be achieved in the absence of a gold standard and outlines the excellent performance of PCR from FFPE tissue, despite relatively the low sensitivity when compared to histopathology.

Indexed as

Paraffin EmbeddingDNA, FungalFormaldehydeFungiHumansImmunohistochemistryInvasive Fungal InfectionsLaboratoriesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, FungalFormaldehydeformalin-fixedfungifungushistologyhistopathologyidentificationimmunohistochemistryparaffin-embeddedtissue

Identifiers

PMID33527526
PMCPMC11950817
OpenAlexW3127810125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.