ArticleMycoses2021
Performance evaluation of fungal DNA PCR amplification from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for diagnosis: Experience of a tertiary reference laboratory.
Article in Mycoses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of panfungal PCR on tissue specimens for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Fungal PCR Initiative (FPCRI).Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of filamentous fungal infections.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- A diverse spectrum of mycoses histologically diagnosed in Ghana: Insights from a 10-year retrospective study.Medical mycology · 2024Article
- A decade of clinical microbiology: top 10 advances in 10 years: what every infection preventionist and antimicrobial steward should know.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Review
- Investigation of a Prolonged and Large Outbreak of Healthcare-Associated Mucormycosis Cases in an Acute Care Hospital-Arkansas, June 2019-May 2021.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics, Health Care Utilization, and Outcomes Among Patients in a Pilot Surveillance System for Invasive Mold Disease-Georgia, United States, 2017-2019.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- A New Duplex PCR-Assay for the Detection and Identification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Nested PCR for the Diagnosis of Feline Sporotrichosis From Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples Using Different DNA Extraction Protocols.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of invasive fungal infections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues by PCR amplification is a developing technology. One of the difficulties of establishing a validated protocol for this testing is that the gold standard, culture, is much less sensitive than the test being validated.
objectivesTo validate FFPE PCR as a refence laboratory identification methodology in the absence of abundant gold standard specimens.
methodsIn this validation, PCR from FFPE tissue was compared to other diagnostic methods for genus/species identification. Four different groups of correlative data from FFPE tissues were used to validate this procedure. Thirteen specimens had culture or serology results and FFPE PCR results, 49 specimens had both immunohistochemistry (IHC) identification and FFPE PCR results, 118 specimens had histological evidence of fungal elements, 64 of which also had FFPE PCR results, and 36 fungal mock tissues or fungal negative tissues were used.
resultsThe sensitivity determined from the tissues with positive fungal histopathology was 54%. The specificity of the cases for which there were both culture and FFPE PCR results was 100%. For the correlation with IHC, the specificity was 98%. For the mock tissues and fungal negative tissues, the calculated analytical sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 95%, and accuracy was 94%.
conclusionsBy uniquely combining various data sources, this study provides a comprehensive framework for how validation can be achieved in the absence of a gold standard and outlines the excellent performance of PCR from FFPE tissue, despite relatively the low sensitivity when compared to histopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.