Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33527351›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2022

Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Emma Gerard, Sarah Zohar, Hoai-Thu Thai, Christelle Lorenzato, Marie-Karelle Riviere, Moreno Ursino

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03594955 (An Open-label, First-in-human, Dose Escalation Study of SAR440234 Administered as Single Agent by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03594955 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this map

An Open-label, First-in-human, Dose Escalation Study of SAR440234 Administered as Single Agent by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (R/R AML), B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL), or High Risk Myelodysplasia (HR-MDS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2018 to 2021Enrolled7ConditionsLeukaemiaArmsSAR440234
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Moving the needle for oncology dose optimization: A call for action.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma GerardCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université de Paris, Paris, F-75006, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2498-4801
Sarah ZoharCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université de Paris, Paris, F-75006, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-2340
Hoai-Thu ThaiTranslation Disease Modeling, Digital and Data Science, Sanofi R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Christelle LorenzatoOncology Biostatistics, Biostatistics and Programming Department, Sanofi R&D, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.
Marie-Karelle RiviereStatistical Methodology Group, Biostatistics and Programming Department, Sanofi R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Moreno UrsinoCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université de Paris, Paris, F-75006, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5709-4322

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie 2018/0530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase I dose-finding trials in oncology seek to find the maximum tolerated dose of a drug under a specific schedule. Evaluating drug schedules aims at improving treatment safety while maintaining efficacy. However, while we can reasonably assume that toxicity increases with the dose for cytotoxic drugs, the relationship between toxicity and multiple schedules remains elusive. We proposed a Bayesian dose regimen assessment method (DRtox) using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) to estimate the maximum tolerated dose regimen (MTD-regimen) at the end of the dose-escalation stage of a trial. We modeled the binary toxicity via a PD endpoint and estimated the dose regimen toxicity relationship through the integration of a dose regimen PD model and a PD toxicity model. For the first model, we considered nonlinear mixed-effects models, and for the second one, we proposed the following two Bayesian approaches: a logistic model and a hierarchical model. In an extensive simulation study, the DRtox outperformed traditional designs in terms of proportion of correctly selecting the MTD-regimen. Moreover, the inclusion of PK/PD information helped provide more precise estimates for the entire dose regimen toxicity curve; therefore the DRtox may recommend alternative untested regimens for expansion cohorts. The DRtox was developed to be applied at the end of the dose-escalation stage of an ongoing trial for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (NCT03594955) once all toxicity and PK/PD data are collected.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaximum Tolerated DoseAntineoplastic AgentsBayesian inferencedose regimenearly phase oncologyhierarchical modelpharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamicstoxicity

Identifiers

PMID33527351
PMCPMC9292001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.