ArticleBiometrics2022
Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Article in Biometrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03594955 (An Open-label, First-in-human, Dose Escalation Study of SAR440234 Administered as Single Agent by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-label, First-in-human, Dose Escalation Study of SAR440234 Administered as Single Agent by Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (R/R AML), B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL), or High Risk Myelodysplasia (HR-MDS)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Review
- Moving the needle for oncology dose optimization: A call for action.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
- Moving the needle for oncology dose optimization: A call for action.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Interpreting Randomized Controlled Trials.Cancers · 2023Review
- Optimizing dose-schedule regimens with bayesian adaptive designs: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- A semi-mechanistic dose-finding design in oncology using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.Pharmaceutical statistics · 2022Article
- Extending the Continual Reassessment Method to accommodate step-up dosing in Phase I trials.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Exposure driven dose escalation design with overdose control: Concept and first real life experience in an oncology phase I trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Bayesian modeling of a bivariate toxicity outcome for early phase oncology trials evaluating dose regimens.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- The Use of Translational Modelling and Simulation to Develop Immunomodulatory Therapy as an Adjunct to Antibiotic Treatment in the Context of Pneumonia.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase I dose-finding trials in oncology seek to find the maximum tolerated dose of a drug under a specific schedule. Evaluating drug schedules aims at improving treatment safety while maintaining efficacy. However, while we can reasonably assume that toxicity increases with the dose for cytotoxic drugs, the relationship between toxicity and multiple schedules remains elusive. We proposed a Bayesian dose regimen assessment method (DRtox) using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) to estimate the maximum tolerated dose regimen (MTD-regimen) at the end of the dose-escalation stage of a trial. We modeled the binary toxicity via a PD endpoint and estimated the dose regimen toxicity relationship through the integration of a dose regimen PD model and a PD toxicity model. For the first model, we considered nonlinear mixed-effects models, and for the second one, we proposed the following two Bayesian approaches: a logistic model and a hierarchical model. In an extensive simulation study, the DRtox outperformed traditional designs in terms of proportion of correctly selecting the MTD-regimen. Moreover, the inclusion of PK/PD information helped provide more precise estimates for the entire dose regimen toxicity curve; therefore the DRtox may recommend alternative untested regimens for expansion cohorts. The DRtox was developed to be applied at the end of the dose-escalation stage of an ongoing trial for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (NCT03594955) once all toxicity and PK/PD data are collected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.