ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2021
Centrifugal Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Patients.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Characterization of Practice, Epidemiology, and Safety Profile at a Children's Hospital in the United States.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Article
- Scope, Safety, and Feasibility of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Pediatric Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Coming of Age?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the safety of centrifugal therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric patients.
methodsThe authors did a retrospective analysis of all TPE procedures performed in pediatric patients over a period of 19 y (2001-2019). Procedures were done on different apheretic devices, daily or on alternate days depending on the clinical condition of the patient. Adverse events during the procedure were noted and analyzed.
resultsA total of 672 TPE (with mean of 6.77 ± 4.85) procedures were performed for 99 pediatric patients with different indications like hematological (n = 68), renal (n = 12), neurology (n = 18) and hepatology (n = 1). The mean age was 7.00 ± 3.11 y and weight was 20.72 ± 9.17 kg. Adverse events (AEs) were observed during 34 (5%) procedures, most common were allergic reactions to replacement fluid (2.24%) followed by hypotension (1.04%), symptomatic hypocalcemia (1.04%), line occlusion (0.59%), and febrile non hemolytic transfusion reaction (0.41%). A significant correlation of AEs was observed with weight (p = 0.045), total blood volume of the patient (p = 0.04), increasing number of procedures (p = 0.000) and replacement fluid [Fresh frozen plasma (FFP)] (p = 0.04). All AEs were managed as per departmental standard operating procedures (SOPs) completing procedures successfully except one which was abandoned. No mortality was observed during the procedures.
conclusionTPE is a safe therapeutic modality in pediatric patients when performed under expert technical supervision with proper SOPs in place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33527338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.