Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33527332›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022

Effect of proton pump inhibitors and H2 antagonists on gastric wall uptake in myocardial perfusion scan with 99mTc-sestamibi.

Ghazal Norouzi, Azin AsadZade, Yazdan Salimi, Sepide Khoshbakht, Elahe Pirayesh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Reducing the effect of proton pump inhibitors augmenting gastrointestinal sestamibi uptake.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ghazal NorouziDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shohadae Tajrish Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, TajrishSq, Tehran, Iran.
Azin AsadZadeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shohadae Tajrish Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, TajrishSq, Tehran, Iran.
Yazdan SalimiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sepide KhoshbakhtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shohadae Tajrish Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, TajrishSq, Tehran, Iran.
Elahe PirayeshDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shohadae Tajrish Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, TajrishSq, Tehran, Iran. Elahe_Pirayesh@yahoo.com.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been speculated to cause gastric wall uptake (GWU) in MPI scans. However, the uptake mechanism and prevention methods are less studied. In this prospective trial we aimed to evaluate the impact of gastroprotective medications on GWU and its solutions.

methods351 consecutive patients, scheduled for 2-day rest/stress 99mTc-MIBI scan, were distributed into 5 groups. 3-7 days following the baseline rest scan, the stress scan was acquired after intervention in the trial group, consisting of patients with history of PPI intake, randomly assigned to 3 subgroups: discontinuing PPIs(A), replacement with H2 blockers (B), and continuing PPIs (C). Patients receiving H2 blockers, continued it as before (D) and the remaining patients were the control group (E). GWU was graded compared to the myocardial uptake.

resultsIn the rest phase, all groups had significantly higher GWU compared to the control group. In the stress phase, group A had less GWU than group B (P-value < 0.05) and both of them had significantly less GWU compared to group C (P-value < 0.001). There was no significant difference between PPI discontinuation periods of 3-5 days versus 5-7 days. There was a significant association between duration of oral PPI intake, but not IV PPIs, and GWU. GWU was significantly lower with oral compared to IV PPI administration.

conclusionPPIs significantly increase GWU and discontinuing them for at least 3-5 days significantly reduces GWU. H2 antagonists are a good alternative in patients who cannot tolerate dyspepsia symptoms.

Indexed as

Proton Pump InhibitorsTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansPerfusionProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump InhibitorsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi99mTc-MIBIgastric wall uptakeH2 antagonistmyocardial perfusion imagingproton pump inhibitorSPECT

Identifiers

PMID33527332
OpenAlexW3128447245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.