ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2021
Should we incorporate obstructive sleep apnea in CHA2DS2-VASc score?
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- CHAFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered a significant challenge in cardiovascular medicine related to significant morbidity and mortality. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with stroke and constitutes an important risk factor for AF. However, it is still ambiguous whether OSA is independently related to stroke or systemic embolism in AF patients, and whether or not OSA should be included in CHA2DS2-VASc score. In a recent study, the presence of OSA in patients with AF was associated with higher rates of adverse events, namely stroke and systemic embolism. Patients with OSA have higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores and mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores that increase with OSA severity. The addition of OSA to CHA2DS2-VASc resulted in improved discrimination, but this improvement was modest and clinically non-significant. However, cardiovascular risk factors that accompany OSA and not OSA per se might be responsible for the increased thromboembolic risk in these patients. It is noteworthy that patients with OSA with CHA2DS2-VASc <2 had a higher incidence of stroke compared to those without. Unfortunately, the event rates for stroke in these patients were too low to reach statistically validated conclusions. Therefore, it seems reasonable to suggest that in borderline stroke risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc <2), the presence of OSA should be taken into account in the treatment decision. More studies are needed to elucidate whether or not OSA should be incorporated in CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.