ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Farmers' health risk and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during pesticide application.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occupational health and safety among tea industry workers in the Ilam district of Nepal: A cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Regenerative Agriculture and Sustainable Plant Protection: Enhancing Resilience Through Natural Strategies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Determinants of pesticide safety behaviors among Iranian farmers: applying the health action model.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The effect of education on safe use of pesticides based on the health belief model.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Occupational exposure to pesticides and endometrial cancer in the Screenwide case-control study.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Article
- Occupational Exposure to Pesticides as a Risk Factor for Sleep Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Effect of Pesticide Exposure over DNA Damage in Farmers from Los Reyes, Michoacan in Mexico.Toxics · 2023Article
- Health Risk of Potato Farmers Exposed to Overuse of Chemical Pesticides in Iran.Safety and health at work · 2022Article
- Role of Lung P450 Oxidoreductase in Paraquat-Induced Collagen Deposition in the Lung.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Occupational safety and health in the agricultural sector: a bibliographic review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTReview
- Influence of pesticide exposure on farmers' cognition: A systematic review.Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is always considered the last and sometimes the most important safety shield against pesticides' hazards health risks. The spread of pests and low-quality pesticides, especially in developing countries, has increased health hazard potential among farmers. The present study aimed to assess farmers' health risks when using PPE (composite index) by exploring its most important predictive factors. A sample of 370 farmers in Ardabil province, Iran, was selected based on the multistage sampling method. The results reveal that most farmers use three types of PPE when applying pesticides. Based on their perception of pesticides' health risk, the number of PPE used differs. The highest health hazard in using PPE and the minimum perception of health risks caused by pesticides among farmers are related to the pesticides Paraquat and Chlorpyrifos. Also, the most important predictive factors of the composite index were found to be farm size, pesticides' health risk perception, previous experiences with harmful effects of chemical pesticides on health (especially among large-scale farmers), training courses, and ability to afford PPE-related costs, respectively. Accordingly, farmers' safety and health programs in the region should focus on reducing or replacing the mentioned high-risk pesticides. Reducing government subsidies for high-risk pesticides, establishing government subsidies for farmers' PPE, providing extension training (especially for small-scale farmers), and receiving ongoing training feedback to improve farmers' health risk perception of pesticides and the need to use PPE will effectively reduce farmers' health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.