ArticlePlant molecular biology2021
Computational identification of ubiquitination sites in Arabidopsis thaliana using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Plant molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances and Application of Machine Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction in Rice: Challenges and Future Perspectives.Proteomes · 2025Review
- ResUbiNet: A Novel Deep Learning Architecture for Ubiquitination Site Prediction.Current genomics · 2025Article
- Modulation of stress granule dynamics by phosphorylation and ubiquitination in plants.iScience · 2024Article
- The mIAA7 degron improves auxin-mediated degradation in Caenorhabditiselegans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- PseAraUbi: predicting arabidopsis ubiquitination sites by incorporating the physico-chemical and structural features.Plant molecular biology · 2022Article
- Biological Sequence Classification: A Review on Data and General Methods.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
key messageWe developed two CNNs for predicting ubiquitination sites in Arabidopsis thaliana, demonstrated their competitive performance, analyzed amino acid physicochemical properties and the CNN structures, and predicted ubiquitination sites in Arabidopsis. As an important posttranslational protein modification, ubiquitination plays critical roles in plant physiology, including plant growth and development, biotic and abiotic stress, metabolism, and so on. A lot of ubiquitination site prediction models have been developed for human, mouse and yeast. However, there are few models to predict ubiquitination sites for the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Based on this context, we proposed two convolutional neural network (CNN) based models for predicting ubiquitination sites in A. thaliana. The two models reach AUC (area under the ROC curve) values of 0.924 and 0.913 respectively in five-fold cross-validation, and 0.921 and 0.914 respectively in independent test, which outperform other models and demonstrate the competitive edge of them. We in-depth analyze the amino acid physicochemical properties in the neighboring sequence regions of the ubiquitination sites, and study the influence of the CNN structure to the prediction performance. Potential ubiquitination sites in the global Arbidopsis proteome are predicted using the two CNN models. To facilitate the community, the source code, training and test dataset, predicted ubiquitination sites in the Arbidopsis proteome are available at GitHub ( http://github.com/nongdaxiaofeng/CNNAthUbi ) for interest users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.