ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2021
Reoperation Because of Dissatisfaction with the Aesthetic Results of Gynecomastia Surgery: Technical Considerations.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Proactive fat grafting from the breast area in gynecomastia surgery: Impact on the prevention of contour irregularities and patient satisfaction.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecomastia is a common disease in male patients that is characterized by benign breast enlargement. Gynecomastia may involve fibroglandular tissue (FGT), supramammary fat tissue, and retromammary fat tissue (RMFT). Gynecomastia is usually treated surgically; however, some patients undergo reoperation because of dissatisfaction with the results of the first operation. This study aimed to analyze the breast conditions requiring reoperation and to identify factors requiring attention during the first gynecomastia surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 98 patients who underwent reoperation because of unsatisfactory esthetic outcomes from January 2014 to April 2020. According to the reasons for dissatisfaction, patients were divided into undercorrection and overcorrection groups. Patients with remnant breast tissue were assigned to the undercorrection group, while those in whom excess breast tissue was removed and was assigned to the overcorrection group.
resultsThe undercorrection and overcorrection groups comprised 81 and 17 patients, respectively. In the undercorrection group, 49 (60.5%) patients had residual FGT and fat tissue necessitating simultaneous FGT excision and liposuction, while 32 (39.5%) patients had no residual FGT and were treated with liposuction only. In the overcorrection group, 13 (76.5%) patients had undergone excessive removal of RMFT at the inferolateral aspect of the pectoralis major muscle margin and were treated by autologous fat grafting.
conclusionsThe most common cause of undercorrection was incomplete FGT removal, and the most common cause of overcorrection was excessive RMFT removal. Complete FGT excision and proper RMFT preservation can reduce the reoperation rate after gynecomastia surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.