ArticleHeart and vessels2021
Clinical effectiveness and adverse events associated with tolvaptan in patients above 90 years of age with acute decompensated heart failure.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Impact of the Early Use of Tolvaptan in Elderly Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure taking tolvaptan: a comparison of patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the aging society, the number of very-elderly (VE) patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is increasing. Although tolvaptan is recommended for patients with ADHF in whom conventional diuretic therapy is ineffective, few reports exist on VE patients over 90 years of age. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and adverse events associated with tolvaptan in VE patients with ADHF. From January 2011 to December 2018, we retrospectively studied 180 patients with ADHF who were first administered tolvaptan during hospitalization. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, VE patients who were ≥ 90 years of age (n = 32) and not-VE patients (NVE) who were < 90 years of age (n = 148). The primary effective endpoints were the total urine volume and change in body weight. The safety endpoints evaluated were the incidence of hypernatremia (≥ 150 mEq/L) and worsening renal function (WRF) at any time during hospitalization. The median [interquartile range] patient age was 93 [91-94] years in the VE group and 80 [69-85] years in the NVE group. The mean dose of tolvaptan for the first week of administration was similar between groups (7.9 ± 5.0 mg, VE group; 7.3 ± 3.7 mg, NVE group; p = 0.52). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the total urine volume at 24 h (1901 ± 666 mL, VE group; 2101 ± 1167 mL, NVE group; p = 0.33) and that at 48 h (3707 ± 1274 mL, VE group; 4195 ± 1990 mL, NVE group; p = 0.19) and in the mean change in body weight (- 2.5 ± 2.0 kg, VE group; -2.7 ± 2.4 kg, NVE group; p = 0.70). The median duration of hospitalization was 24 [20-9] and 31 [20-42] days in the VE and NVE groups, respectively (p = 0.67). The incidence of hypernatremia (6.3% (2/32), VE group; 3.4% (5/148), NVE group; p = 0.61) and WRF (25.0% (8/32) VE group; 19.6% (29/148), NVE group; p = 0.31) was similar between the groups. In conclusion, tolvaptan has similar clinical effectiveness in increasing urine volume and decreasing body weight, without increased adverse events, in VE patients with ADHF who were ≥ 90 years of age compared to NVE patients with ADHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.