ArticleJournal of clinical and translational endocrinology case reports2021
A novel telemedicine protocol improved outcomes for high-risk patients with type 1 diabetes: A 3-month quality improvement project during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational endocrinology case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Telemedicine in Glycemic Control in Adult Patients with Diabetes during the COVID-19 Era-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Telemedicine and COVID-19 pandemic: The perfect storm to mark a change in diabetes care. Results from a world-wide cross-sectional web-based survey.Pediatric diabetes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our endocrinology practice needed to protect its highest-risk patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during the COVID-19 pandemic. To do so, we needed to identify these patients and develop a protocol to keep them out of the hospital (to limit risk of infection and conserve medical resources), and do so without in-person visits. So we used our peer-reviewed software, Diabetes Reporting, to identify 87 patients whose glucose management indicator (GMI) scores were over 9%. The GMI is a method for estimating the laboratory A1C using the patient's actual blood glucose measurements over the past 90 days. A GMI (or A1C) over 9% indicates a heightened risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and, possibly, a slightly higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH), the two most common acute complications leading patients with T1D to be hospitalized. We contacted these 87 at-risk patients and enrolled them in a quality improvement project. This project consisted of additional online meetings with their doctors as well as weekly reports generated by Diabetes Reporting for three months, between March 28, 2020 and June 28, 2020. We hypothesized that this heightened communication would reduce the incidence of DKA and SH among the participants by reducing their GMI. As a comparison group, we used data from the T1D Exchange, which showed that, among patients with an A1C over 9%, 6.7% were hospitalized for DKA and 7% experienced SH leading to loss of consciousness in a three-month period. This led us to predict 6 incidences of DKA and 6 incidences of SH among our 87 participants during the three-month period. Instead, we saw 2 incidences of DKA and 1 incidence of SH. Moreover, the mean GMI of our participants dropped from 9.91% to 9.25%, a clinically-significant 0.66% improvement, which supports the conclusion that our protocol helped avoid acute complications among a cohort of at-risk patients with T1D by improving glycemic control during a time when we were limited to largely online care. This telemedicine protocol merits further research for its potential to improve and lower costs of care for patients with T1D, particularly for those at higher risk for acute complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.