Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526806›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2021

Quantitative analysis of abnormalities in gynecologic cytopathology with deep learning.

Jing Ke, Yiqing Shen, Yizhou Lu, Junwei Deng, Jason D Wright, Yan Zhang, Qin Huang, Dadong Wang, Naifeng Jing, Xiaoyao Liang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gynecology Meets Big Data in the Disruptive Innovation Medical Era: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jing KeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. kejing@sjtu.edu.cn.
Yiqing ShenSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7866-3339
Yizhou LuSchool of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Junwei DengSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jason D WrightDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Tongshu Medical Laboratory Co.Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Qin HuangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai, China.
Dadong WangQuantitative Imaging, Data61 CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Naifeng JingDepartment of Micro-Nano Electronics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyao LiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Fusong JiangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-0041
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNColumbia University · USCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in women worldwide, yet the early detection and treatment of lesions via regular cervical screening have led to a drastic reduction in the mortality rate. However, the routine examination of screening as a regular health checkup of women is characterized as time-consuming and labor-intensive, while there is lack of characteristic phenotypic profile and quantitative analysis. In this research, over the analysis of a privately collected and manually annotated dataset of 130 cytological whole-slide images, the authors proposed a deep-learning diagnostic system to localize, grade, and quantify squamous cell abnormalities. The system can distinguish abnormalities at the morphology level, namely atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and squamous cell carcinoma, as well as differential phenotypes of normal cells. The case study covered 51 positive and 79 negative digital gynecologic cytology slides collected from 2016 to 2018. Our automatic diagnostic system demonstrated its sensitivity of 100% at slide-level abnormality prediction, with the confirmation with three pathologists who performed slide-level diagnosis and training sample annotations. In the cellular-level classification, we yielded an accuracy of 94.5% in the binary classification between normality and abnormality, and the AUC was above 85% for each subtype of epithelial abnormality. Although the final confirmation from pathologists is often a must, empirically, computer-aided methods are capable of the effective extraction, interpretation, and quantification of morphological features, while also making it more objective and reproducible.

Indexed as

Deep LearningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervix UteriFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasm Grading

Identifiers

PMID33526806
OpenAlexW3126463648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.