Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526669›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Expression attenuation as a mechanism of robustness against gene duplication.

Diana Ascencio, Guillaume Diss, Isabelle Gagnon-Arsenault, Alexandre K Dubé, Alexander DeLuna, Christian R Landry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic and proteomic ramifications of segmental amplification inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic analyses elucidateEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana AscencioRegroupement Québécois de Recherche sur la Fonction, l'Ingénierie et les Applications des Protéines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4808-1244
Guillaume DissRegroupement Québécois de Recherche sur la Fonction, l'Ingénierie et les Applications des Protéines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-4523
Isabelle Gagnon-ArsenaultRegroupement Québécois de Recherche sur la Fonction, l'Ingénierie et les Applications des Protéines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2661-1929
Alexandre K DubéRegroupement Québécois de Recherche sur la Fonction, l'Ingénierie et les Applications des Protéines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8718-9894
Alexander DeLunaUnidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, 36824 Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9236-2804
Christian R LandryRegroupement Québécois de Recherche sur la Fonction, l'Ingénierie et les Applications des Protéines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; christian.landry@bio.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3028-6866
PROTEO · CACentro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados · MX

Funding

CIHR 387697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is ubiquitous and a major driver of phenotypic diversity across the tree of life, but its immediate consequences are not fully understood. Deleterious effects would decrease the probability of retention of duplicates and prevent their contribution to long-term evolution. One possible detrimental effect of duplication is the perturbation of the stoichiometry of protein complexes. Here, we measured the fitness effects of the duplication of 899 essential genes in the budding yeast using high-resolution competition assays. At least 10% of genes caused a fitness disadvantage when duplicated. Intriguingly, the duplication of most protein complex subunits had small to nondetectable effects on fitness, with few exceptions. We selected four complexes with subunits that had an impact on fitness when duplicated and measured the impact of individual gene duplications on their protein-protein interactions. We found that very few duplications affect both fitness and interactions. Furthermore, large complexes such as the 26S proteasome are protected from gene duplication by attenuation of protein abundance. Regulatory mechanisms that maintain the stoichiometric balance of protein complexes may protect from the immediate effects of gene duplication. Our results show that a better understanding of protein regulation and assembly in complexes is required for the refinement of current models of gene duplication.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, EssentialGenetic FitnessProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein Interaction MapsProtein SubunitsSaccharomycetalesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein Subunitsdosage balance hypothesisfitness effectsgene duplicationgene expressionprotein interaction

Identifiers

PMID33526669
PMCPMC7970654
OpenAlexW3128187699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.