Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526665›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Learning to silence saccadic suppression.

Chris Scholes, Paul V McGraw, Neil W Roach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris ScholesVisual Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom chris.scholes@nottingham.ac.uk neil.roach@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1597-3070
Paul V McGrawVisual Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9484-8560
Neil W RoachVisual Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom chris.scholes@nottingham.ac.uk neil.roach@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4155-745X
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT097387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual stability is facilitated by a decrease in visual sensitivity during rapid eye movements, called saccadic suppression. While a large body of evidence demonstrates that saccadic programming is plastic, little is known about whether the perceptual consequences of saccades can be modified. Here, we demonstrate that saccadic suppression is attenuated during learning on a standard visual detection-in-noise task, to the point that it is effectively silenced. Across a period of 7 days, 44 participants were trained to detect brief, low-contrast stimuli embedded within dynamic noise, while eye position was tracked. Although instructed to fixate, participants regularly made small fixational saccades. Data were accumulated over a large number of trials, allowing us to assess changes in performance as a function of the temporal proximity of stimuli and saccades. This analysis revealed that improvements in sensitivity over the training period were accompanied by a systematic change in the impact of saccades on performance-robust saccadic suppression on day 1 declined gradually over subsequent days until its magnitude became indistinguishable from zero. This silencing of suppression was not explained by learning-related changes in saccade characteristics and generalized to an untrained retinal location and stimulus orientation. Suppression was restored when learned stimulus timing was perturbed, consistent with the operation of a mechanism that temporarily reduces or eliminates saccadic suppression, but only when it is behaviorally advantageous to do so. Our results indicate that learning can circumvent saccadic suppression to improve performance, without compromising its functional benefits in other viewing contexts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationSaccadesTime FactorsVisual PerceptionYoung Adultmicrosaccadesperceptual learningsaccadic suppression

Identifiers

PMID33526665
PMCPMC8018005
OpenAlexW3127399664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.