Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526595›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Nonsurgical treatment of skin cancer with local delivery of bioadhesive nanoparticles.

Jamie K Hu, Hee-Won Suh, Munibah Qureshi, Julia M Lewis, Sharon Yaqoob, Zoe M Moscato, Sofia Griff, Alison K Lee, Emily S Yin, W Mark Saltzman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bioadhesive Eudragit RLPharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nanoparticles as a Therapeutic Delivery System for Skin Cancer Prevention and Treatment.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in nanomaterial-based targeted drug delivery systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bioadhesive Nanoparticles for Local Drug Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Applications of Bioadhesives: A Mini Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie K HuDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-0271
Hee-Won SuhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0001-7846-6087
Munibah QureshiDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-2915
Julia M LewisDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0002-9897-1950
Sharon YaqoobDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-6944
Zoe M MoscatoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0003-0058-5603
Sofia GriffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0002-7667-9393
Alison K LeeDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
Emily S YinDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-2911
W Mark SaltzmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-549X
Michael GirardiDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; michael.girardi@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-9343
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Liver CenterP30DK034989 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YASUKO IWAKIRI · 1986 to 2026
$31.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratinocyte-derived carcinomas, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), comprise the most common malignancies. Surgical excision is the therapeutic standard but is not always clinically feasible, and currently available alternatives are limited to superficial tumors. To address the need for a nonsurgical treatment for nodular skin cancers like SCC, we developed a bioadhesive nanoparticle (BNP) drug delivery system composed of biodegradable polymer, poly(lactic acid)-hyperbranched polyglycerol (PLA-HPG), encapsulating camptothecin (CPT). Nanoparticles (NPs) of PLA-HPG are nonadhesive NPs (NNPs), which are stealthy in their native state, but we have previously shown that conversion of the vicinal diols of HPG to aldehydes conferred NPs the ability to form strong covalent bonds with amine-rich surfaces. Herein, we show that these BNPs have significantly enhanced binding to SCC tumor cell surfaces and matrix proteins, thereby significantly enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of intratumoral drug delivery. Tumor injection of BNP-CPT resulted in tumor retention of CPT at ∼50% at 10 d postinjection, while CPT was undetectable in NNP-CPT or free (intralipid) CPT-injected tumors at that time. BNP-CPT also significantly reduced tumor burden, with a portion (∼20%) of BNP-CPT-treated established tumors showing histologic cure. Larger, more fully established PDV SCC tumors treated with a combination of BNP-CPT and immunostimulating CpG oligodeoxynucleotides exhibited enhanced survival relative to controls, revealing the potential for BNP delivery to be used along with local tumor immunotherapy. Taken together, these results indicate that percutaneous delivery of a chemotherapeutic agent via BNPs, with or without adjuvant immunostimulation, represents a viable, nonsurgical alternative for treating cutaneous malignancy.

Indexed as

AdhesivesAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorGlycerolMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesPolyestersPolymersSkin NeoplasmsAdhesivesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinGlycerolPolyesterspolyglycerolpoly(lactide)Polymerschemotherapydrug deliveryimmunotherapynanoparticlesquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33526595
PMCPMC7896333
OpenAlexW3127462075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.