Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526495›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Cohort profile: Dementia in the Registry of Senior Australians.

Monica Cations, Catherine E Lang, Stephanie A Ward, Maria Crotty, Craig Whitehead, John Maddison, Maria Inacio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cohort Profile: The Dementia Registry in Macao.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Monica CationsRegistry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia monica.cations@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9262-0463
Catherine E LangRegistry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stephanie A WardCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Maria CrottyCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Craig WhiteheadCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
John MaddisonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Maria InacioRegistry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical quality registries (CQRs) are being established in many countries to monitor, benchmark, and report on the quality of dementia care over time. Case ascertainment can be challenging given that diagnosis occurs in a variety of settings. The Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA) includes a large cohort of people with dementia from all Australian states and territories identified using routinely collected aged care assessment data. In ROSA, assessment data are linked to information about aged and health service use, medicine dispensing, hospitalisations and the National Death Index. The ROSA dementia cohort was established to capture people for the Australian dementia CQR currently in development who may not be identified elsewhere.

participantsThere were 373 695 people with dementia identified in aged care assessments from 2008 to 2016. Cross-sectional analysis from the time of cohort entry (e.g. when first identified with dementia on an aged care assessment) indicates that individuals were 84.1 years old on average, and 63.1% were female. More than 44% were first identified at entry to permanent residential aged care. The cohort recorded more severe cognitive impairment at entry than other international dementia registries. FINDINGS TO DATE: The cohort has so far been used to demonstrate a declining prevalence of dementia in individuals entering the aged care sector, examine trends in psychotropic medicine prescribing, and to examine the impact of dementia on aged care service use and outcomes. FUTURE PLANS: The ROSA dementia cohort will be updated periodically and is a powerful resource both on its own and as a contributor to the Australian dementia CQR. Integration of the ROSA dementia cohort with the dementia CQR will ensure that people with dementia using aged care services can benefit from the ongoing monitoring and benchmarking of care that a registry can provide.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesdementiaepidemiologygeriatric medicinequality in health carestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID33526495
PMCPMC7852970
OpenAlexW3128615238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.