The learning curve in proximal hypospadias repair.

introductionAlthough the learning curve in various surgical procedures is increasingly discussed, there have been only a few reports about the learning curve especially in proximal hypospadias repair.

objectivesTo evaluate the learning curve in one-stage hypospadias repair for proximal hypospadias. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 73 cases of primary hypospadias repair by a single pediatric urologist using one-stage urethroplasty with a preputial skin graft between 2007 and 2018. The overall complication rate included fistula, glans dehiscence, and meatal stenosis. To analyze the impact of the surgeon's experience on the complication rate, we compared the complication rates among different groups of 20 consecutive cases each. In addition, we graphed the actual data of the operative time and cumulative complication rate to evaluate the learning curve. The cumulative complication rate was defined as the surgeon's complication rate (the number of complications accumulated at a time/number of cases at that time).

resultsThe median age at surgery was 18 months (range: 7-87). The median follow-up was 40 months (range: 3-114). In total, 13 (18%) children had complications: 9 fistulae, 3 glans dehiscence, and 2 metal stenoses. The analysis of each 20 cases revealed that the complication rate declined over time as the surgeon became more experienced. It was mainly attributed to a decline of the fistula rate. The diagram of the operative time showed a reduction with the increasing surgical experience. Additionally, the diagram of the cumulative complication rate demonstrated a plateau after 50 cases.

conclusionOur study showed the positive impact of surgeon experience on the outcome of one-stage repair for proximal hypospadias. In addition, the learning curve in proximal hypospadias repair stabilized after about 50 cases although the supervision of experienced surgeons is required during the early phase of learning curve.