Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526107›Full record

ArticleJournal of cannabis research2020

Acute effects of naturalistic THC vs. CBD use on recognition memory: a preliminary study.

Tim Curran, Hélène Devillez, Sophie L YorkWilliams, L Cinnamon Bidwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of acute ΔBrain research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tim CurranDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, UCB 345, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA. Tim.Curran@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-8306
Hélène DevillezDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA.
Sophie L YorkWilliamsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA.
L Cinnamon BidwellDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 96947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ratio of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to cannabidiol (CBD) varies widely across cannabis strains. CBD has opposite effects to THC on a variety of cognitive functions, including acute THC-induced memory impairments. However, additional data are needed, especially under naturalistic conditions with higher potency forms of cannabis, commonly available in legal markets. The goal of this study was to collect preliminary data on the acute effects of different THC:CBD ratios on memory testing in a brief verbal recognition task under naturalistic conditions, using legal-market Colorado dispensary products. Thirty-two regular cannabis users consumed cannabis of differing THC and CBD levels purchased from a dispensary and were assessed via blood draw and a verbal recognition memory test both before (pretest) and after (posttest) ad libitum home administration in a mobile laboratory. Memory accuracy decreased as post-use THC blood levels increased (n = 29), whereas performance showed no relationship to CBD blood levels. When controlling for post-use THC blood levels as a covariate, participants using primarily THC-based strains showed significantly worse memory accuracy post-use, whereas subjects using strains containing both THC and CBD showed no differences between pre- and post-use memory performance. Using a brief and sensitive verbal recognition task, our study demonstrated that naturalistic, acute THC use impairs memory in a dose dependent manner, whereas the combination of CBD and THC was not associated with impairment.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCannabisEpisodic memoryMarijuanaVerbal memory

Identifiers

PMID33526107
PMCPMC7819319
OpenAlexW3087751893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.