Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526053›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Isolating the energetic and mechanical consequences of imposed reductions in ankle and knee flexion during gait.

Emily M McCain, Theresa L Libera, Matthew E Berno, Gregory S Sawicki, Katherine R Saul, Michael D Lewek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily M McCainNorth Carolina State University, 911 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA. emmccain@ncsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5858-5871
Theresa L LiberaNorth Carolina State University, 911 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Matthew E BernoNorth Carolina State University, 911 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Gregory S SawickiGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Katherine R SaulNorth Carolina State University, 911 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Michael D LewekUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

NRI: Novel platform for rapid exploration of robotic ankle exoskeleton control stR01NR014756 · NINR · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KAMPER, DEREK, SAWICKI, GREGORY STEPHEN · 2013 to 2017
$729k
Optimizing impedance control of an ankle exoskeleton to improve post-stroke walking mechanics and energeticsF31HD097872 · NICHD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MCCAIN, EMILY · 2019 to 2021
$103k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development F31 HD097872-01NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD097872NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeakness of ankle and knee musculature following injury or disorder results in reduced joint motion associated with metabolically expensive gait compensations to enable limb support and advancement. However, neuromechanical coupling between the ankle and knee make it difficult to discern independent roles of these restrictions in joint motion on compensatory mechanics and metabolic penalties.

methodsWe sought to determine relative impacts of ankle and knee impairment on compensatory gait strategies and energetic outcomes using an unimpaired cohort (N = 15) with imposed unilateral joint range of motion restrictions as a surrogate for reduced motion resulting from gait pathology. Participants walked on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill at 0.8 m s

resultsWhen ankle motion was restricted (restricted-ank, restricted-a + k) we observed decreased peak propulsion relative to the braced condition on the restricted limb. Reduced knee motion (restricted-knee, restricted-a + k) increased restricted limb circumduction relative to the restricted-ank condition through ipsilateral hip hiking. Interestingly, restricted limb average positive hip power increased in the restricted-ank condition but decreased in the restricted-a + k and restricted-knee conditions, suggesting that locking the knee impeded hip compensation. As expected, reduced ankle motion, either without (restricted-ank) or in addition to knee restriction (restricted-a + k) yielded significant increase in net metabolic rate when compared with the braced condition. Furthermore, the relative increase in metabolic cost was significantly larger with restricted-a + k when compared to restricted-knee condition.

conclusionsOur methods allowed for the reproduction of asymmetric gait characteristics including reduced propulsive symmetry and increased circumduction. The metabolic consequences bolster the potential energetic benefit of targeting ankle function during rehabilitation.

trial registrationN/A.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAnkleAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansKnee JointMaleRange of Motion, ArticularWalkingYoung AdultAnkleBiomechanicsGaitKneeMetabolic cost

Identifiers

PMID33526053
PMCPMC7852087
OpenAlexW3108465692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.