Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33526004›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Towards Personalized Auditory Models: Predicting Individual Sensorineural Hearing-Loss Profiles From Recorded Human Auditory Physiology.

Sarineh Keshishzadeh, Markus Garrett, Sarah Verhulst

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07091071 (Evaluation of the CochSyn Device in Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07091071 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the CochSyn Device in Clinical Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2025 to 2026Enrolled65ConditionsHearing Loss, Sensorineural, Cochlear Hearing Loss, Cochlear Synaptopathy, DFNA9ArmsCochSyn device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarineh KeshishzadehHearing Technology @ WAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-8243
Markus GarrettMedizinische Physik and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-5288
Sarah VerhulstHearing Technology @ WAVES, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, Belgium.
Ghent University · BECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decades, different types of auditory models have been developed to study the functioning of normal and impaired auditory processing. Several models can simulate frequency-dependent sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and can in this way be used to develop personalized audio-signal processing for hearing aids. However, to determine individualized SNHL profiles, we rely on indirect and noninvasive markers of cochlear and auditory-nerve (AN) damage. Our progressive knowledge of the functional aspects of different SNHL subtypes stresses the importance of incorporating them into the simulated SNHL profile, but has at the same time complicated the task of accomplishing this on the basis of noninvasive markers. In particular, different auditory-evoked potential (AEP) types can show a different sensitivity to outer-hair-cell (OHC), inner-hair-cell (IHC), or AN damage, but it is not clear which AEP-derived metric is best suited to develop personalized auditory models. This study investigates how simulated and recorded AEPs can be used to derive individual AN- or OHC-damage patterns and personalize auditory processing models. First, we individualized the cochlear model parameters using common methods of frequency-specific OHC-damage quantification, after which we simulated AEPs for different degrees of AN damage. Using a classification technique, we determined the recorded AEP metric that best predicted the simulated individualized cochlear synaptopathy profiles. We cross-validated our method using the data set at hand, but also applied the trained classifier to recorded AEPs from a new cohort to illustrate the generalizability of the method.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, SensorineuralVestibulocochlear Physiological PhenomenaAuditory ThresholdCochleaEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingHumansauditory-evoked potentialsauditory modelingcochlear synaptopathyelectrophysiologyenvelope following responseindividualized hearing-loss profilesensorineural hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID33526004
PMCPMC7871356
OpenAlexW3128198149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.