Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525997›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2021

Detecting Deteriorating Patients in the Hospital: Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System.

Marco A F Pimentel, Oliver C Redfern, James Malycha, Paul Meredith, David Prytherch, Jim Briggs, J Duncan Young, David A Clifton, Lionel Tarassenko, Peter J Watkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. The early warning paradox.NPJ digital medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco A F PimentelInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and.
Oliver C RedfernNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
James MalychaNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paul MeredithResearch and Innovation Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
David PrytherchCentre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; and.
Jim BriggsCentre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; and.
J Duncan YoungNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David A CliftonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and.
Lionel TarassenkoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and.
Peter J WatkinsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust WT-103703/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationEarly Warning ScoreGuidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesearly warning scoresmachine learningphysiological monitoringretrospective observational study

Identifiers

PMID33525997
PMCPMC8437126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.