Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525965›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2021

Harmonizing child mortality data at disparate geographic levels.

Neal Marquez, Jon Wakefield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neal MarquezDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-4052
Jon WakefieldDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

STATISTICAL ISSUES IN AIDS RESEARCHR37AI029168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES P HUGHES · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN AIDS RESEARCHR01AI029168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HUGHES, JAMES P · 1989 to 2018
$5.3M
T32 Data Science and Demography Training BSSRT32HD101442 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Zack W Almquist, SARA R. CURRAN · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY: METHODS AND APPLICATIONSR01CA095994 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAKEFIELD, JONATHAN C · 2005 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095994NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI029168NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI029168NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD101442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing focus on reducing inequalities in health outcomes in developing countries. Subnational variation is of particular interest, with geographically-indexed data being used to understand the spatial risk of detrimental outcomes and to identify who is at greatest risk. While some health surveys provide observations with associated geographic coordinates (point data), many others provide data that have their locations masked and instead only report the strata (polygon information) within which the data resides (masked data). How to harmonize these data sources for spatial analysis has been previously considered although only ad hoc methods and comparison of methods is lacking. In this paper, we present a new method for analyzing masked survey data, using a method that is consistent with the data-generating process. In addition, we critique two previously proposed approaches to analyzing masked data and illustrate that they are fundamentally flawed methodologically. To validate our method, we compare our approach with previously formulated solutions in several realistic simulation environments in which the underlying structure of the risk field is known. We simulate samples from spatiotemporal fields in a way that mimics the sampling frame implemented in the most common health surveys in low- and middle-income countries, the Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. In simulations, the newly proposed approach outperforms previously proposed approaches in terms of minimizing error while increasing the precision of estimates. The approaches are subsequently compared using child mortality data from the Dominican Republic where our findings are reinforced. The ability to accurately increase precision of child mortality estimates, and health outcomes in general, by leveraging various types of data, improves our ability to implement precision public health initiatives and better understand the landscape of geographic health inequalities.

Indexed as

Child MortalityResearch DesignChildHealth SurveysHumansSpatial AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesBayesian inferenceModel-based geostatisticsspatial demographyspatial misalignment

Identifiers

PMID33525965
PMCPMC8131239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.