ArticleEmerging topics in life sciences2018
Taxis in archaea.
Article in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Salty secrets of Halobacterium salinarum AD88: a new archaeal ecotype isolated from Cuatro Cienegas Basin.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification of structural and regulatory cell-shape determinants in Haloferax volcanii.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Inter-turn intervals inCommunicative & integrative biology · 2024Article
- Oscillators and servomechanisms in navigation and orientation.Communicative & integrative biology · 2024Article
- Putative nucleotide-based second messengers in archaea.microLife · 2023Review
- Composition, organization and mechanisms of the transition zone, a gate for the cilium.EMBO reports · 2022Review
- Comparative Genomic Insights into Chemoreceptor Diversity and Habitat Adaptation of Archaea.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Structural insights into the mechanism of archaellar rotational switching.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Methods to Analyze Motility in Eury- and Crenarchaea.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- A comprehensive history of motility and Archaellation in Archaea.FEMS microbes · 2021Article
- Article
- Haloarchaea swim slowly for optimal chemotactic efficiency in low nutrient environments.Nature communications · 2020Article
- The switch complex ArlCDE connects the chemotaxis system and the archaellum.Molecular microbiology · 2020Article
- Structure of the archaeal chemotaxis protein CheY in a domain-swapped dimeric conformation.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms can move towards favorable growth conditions as a response to environmental stimuli. This process requires a motility structure and a system to direct the movement. For swimming motility, archaea employ a rotating filament, the archaellum. This archaea-specific structure is functionally equivalent, but structurally different, from the bacterial flagellum. To control the directionality of movement, some archaea make use of the chemotaxis system, which is used for the same purpose by bacteria. Over the past decades, chemotaxis has been studied in detail in several model bacteria. In contrast, archaeal chemotaxis is much less explored and largely restricted to analyses in halophilic archaea. In this review, we summarize the available information on archaeal taxis. We conclude that archaeal chemotaxis proteins function similarly as their bacterial counterparts. However, because the motility structures are fundamentally different, an archaea-specific docking mechanism is required, for which initial experimental data have only recently been obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.