Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525603›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Critical Review of Visual Models for Police Use of Force Decision-Making.

Paula M Di Nota, Peter Stoyko, Jodie Jenkinson, Evelyn C Boychuk, Judith P Andersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Considering Objective and Subjective Measures for Police Use of Force Evaluation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula M Di NotaDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-6129
Peter StoykoElanica Information Design, B108-1241 Kilborn Place, Ottawa, ON K1H 1A5, Canada.
Jodie JenkinsonGraduate Program in Biomedical Communications, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.
Evelyn C BoychukDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-9862
Judith P AndersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.

Funding

Ontario Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services (now Ministry of the Solicitor General) ROP2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent calls for widespread police reform include re-examination of existing training and practice surrounding the use of force (UOF, e.g., verbal and non-verbal communication, physical tactics, firearms). Visual models representing police UOF decision-making are used for both police training and public communication. However, most models have not been empirically developed or assessed in either the applied police or vision science literatures, representing significant gaps in knowledge. The purpose of the current review is to provide a novel, relevant, and practical analysis of the visual components of three common police UOF decision-making model types (circular, cyclical, staircase). We begin with a critical evaluation of the visual features specific to each model type (i.e., shape), followed by critical reviews of common visual features, including colour, implied motion, text, and clarity. The insights provided by the current work afford scientists from visual disciplines a unique opportunity to contribute meaningfully to the improvement of existing police UOF practices, with the goal of promoting public and occupational safety. To this end, we conclude with evidence-based recommendations for designing visual models that effectively promote training of police and communication of police UOF decision-making to the public.

Indexed as

critical decision-makingde-escalationinformation visualizationpolice traininguse of forcevisual models

Identifiers

PMID33525603
PMCPMC7931114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.