Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525420›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Fast Multi-Focus Fusion Based on Deep Learning for Early-Stage Embryo Image Enhancement.

Vidas Raudonis, Agne Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, Kristina Sutiene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vidas RaudonisDepartment of Automation, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu 48, 51367 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-7245-7606
Agne Paulauskaite-TarasevicieneDepartment of Applied Informatics, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu 50, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-8787-3343
Kristina SutieneDepartment of Mathematical Modelling, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu 50, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-3194
Kaunas University of Technology · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell detection and counting is of essential importance in evaluating the quality of early-stage embryo. Full automation of this process remains a challenging task due to different cell size, shape, the presence of incomplete cell boundaries, partially or fully overlapping cells. Moreover, the algorithm to be developed should process a large number of image data of different quality in a reasonable amount of time.

methodsMulti-focus image fusion approach based on deep learning U-Net architecture is proposed in the paper, which allows reducing the amount of data up to 7 times without losing spectral information required for embryo enhancement in the microscopic image.

resultsThe experiment includes the visual and quantitative analysis by estimating the image similarity metrics and processing times, which is compared to the results achieved by two wellknown techniques-Inverse Laplacian Pyramid Transform and Enhanced Correlation Coefficient Maximization.

conclusionComparatively, the image fusion time is substantially improved for different image resolutions, whilst ensuring the high quality of the fused image.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAutomationImage Enhancementconvolutional neural networkscorrelation coefficient maximizationdata reductiondeep learningembryo developmentimage fusionlaplacian pyramidmulti-focus

Identifiers

PMID33525420
PMCPMC7865517
OpenAlexW3124351263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.