Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525406›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Recent Advances and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose in Biomedicine.

Sam Swingler, Abhishek Gupta, Hazel Gibson, Marek Kowalczuk, Wayne Heaselgrave, Iza Radecka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cellulose-Based Nanofibers in Wound Dressing.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cellulose-Based Electrochemical Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. EnhancingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sam SwinglerWolverhampton School of Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2447-2278
Abhishek GuptaResearch Institute in Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7901-1818
Hazel GibsonWolverhampton School of Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.
Marek KowalczukCentre of Polymer and Carbon Materials, Polish Academy of Sciences, M. Curie-Sklodowskiej 34, 41-819 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2877-7466
Wayne HeaselgraveResearch Institute in Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.
Iza RadeckaWolverhampton School of Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-8803

Funding

European Regional Development Fund Project EnTRESS 01R16P00718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is an extracellular polymer produced by

Indexed as

bacterial cellulosebiomedicinebiopolymerdrug carrierhydrogelwound dressing

Identifiers

PMID33525406
PMCPMC7865233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.