ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
HumTouch: Localization of Touch on Semi-Conductive Surfaces by Sensing Human Body Antenna Signal.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HumTouch is a touch sensing technology utilizing the environmental electromagnetic wave. The method can be realized using conductive and semi-conductive materials by simply attaching electrodes to the object's surface. In this study, we compared three methods for localizing a touch on 20×16cm2 and 40×36cm2 papers, on which four or eight electrodes were attached to record the voltages leaked from the human fingertip. The number and positions of the electrodes and the data processing of the voltages differed according to the localization methods. By constructing a kernel regression analysis model between the electrode outputs and the actual physical locations, the touched locations were estimated. Each of the three methods was tested via leave-one-out cross validation. Out of the three methods discussed, two exhibited superior performances in terms of the estimation errors. Of these two methods, one simply uses the voltages recorded by the four electrodes attached on the middle of paper edges as inputs to the regression system. The other uses differential outputs of electrode pairs as the inputs. The smallest mean location errors were 0.31 cm on 20×16cm2 paper and 0.27 cm on 40×36cm2 paper, which are smaller than the size of a fingertip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.