Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525331›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

LACE Score-Based Risk Management Tool for Long-Term Home Care Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Taiwan.

Mei-Chin Su, Yu-Chun Chen, Mei-Shu Huang, Yen-Hsi Lin, Li-Hwa Lin, Hsiao-Ting Chang, Tzeng-Ji Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in Population-Based Healthcare Research: From Measures to Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of Older Adults under Home Care in Taiwan's Ageing Society.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mei-Chin SuDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun ChenInstitute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4124-1949
Mei-Shu HuangDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Yen-Hsi LinDepartment of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Li-Hwa LinDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Ting ChangDepartment of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-8499
Tzeng-Ji ChenInstitute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8350-0232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffectively predicting and reducing readmission in long-term home care (LTHC) is challenging. We proposed, validated, and evaluated a risk management tool that stratifies LTHC patients by LACE predictive score for readmission risk, which can further help home care providers intervene with individualized preventive plans.

methodA before-and-after study was conducted by a LTHC unit in Taiwan. Patients with acute hospitalization within 30 days after discharge in the unit were enrolled as two cohorts (Pre-Implement cohort in 2017 and Post-Implement cohort in 2019). LACE score performance was evaluated by calibration and discrimination (AUC, area under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve). The clinical utility was evaluated by negative predictive value (NPV).

resultsThere were 48 patients with 87 acute hospitalizations in Pre-Implement cohort, and 132 patients with 179 hospitalizations in Post-Implement cohort. These LTHC patients were of older age, mostly intubated, and had more comorbidities. There was a significant reduction in readmission rate by 44.7% (readmission rate 25.3% vs. 14.0% in both cohorts). Although LACE score predictive model still has room for improvement (AUC = 0.598), it showed the potential as a useful screening tool (NPV, 87.9%; 95% C.I., 74.2-94.8). The reduction effect is more pronounced in infection-related readmission.

conclusionAs real-world evidence, LACE score-based risk management tool significantly reduced readmission by 44.7% in this LTHC unit. Larger scale studies involving multiple homecare units are needed to assess the generalizability of this study.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesPatient ReadmissionAgedEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRisk ManagementTaiwanLACE scorelong-term care (LTC)long-term home care (LTHC)predictive modelreadmissionreadmission risk management

Identifiers

PMID33525331
PMCPMC7908226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.