Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525236›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2020

Triage protocol for allocation of critical health resources during Covid-19 pandemic and public health emergencies. A narrative review.

Laura Iacorossi, Alice J Fauci, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela D'Angelo, Katia Salomone, Roberto Latina, Daniela Coclite, Primiano Iannone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura IacorossiNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. laura.iacorossi@iss.it.
Alice J FauciNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. alice.fauci@iss.it.
Antonello NapoletanoNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. antonello.napoletano@iss.it.
Daniela D'AngeloNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. daniela.dangelo@iss.it.
Katia SalomoneNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. katia.salomone@iss.it.
Roberto LatinaArray. roblatina@gmail.com.
Daniela CocliteNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. daniela.coclite@iss.it.
Primiano IannoneNational Center for Clinical Excellence, Quality and Safety of Care (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy. primiano.iannone@iss.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and aim of the workTriage during the Covid-19 pandemic can impose difficult allocation decisions when demand for mechanical ventilation or intensive care beds greatly exceeds available resources. Triage criteria should be objective, ethical, transparent, applied equitably and publically disclosed. The aim of this review is to describe the triage tools and process for critical care resources in a pandemic health emergency.

methodsA narrative review was conducted of the literature on five electronic databases, namely PubMed, CINHAL, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase, searching for studies published from 2006 to June 2020.

resultsThe results describe different triage tools. A gold standard of triage does not exist for the adult or paediatric population. Using probability of short-term survival as the sole allocation principle is problematic. In general, each triage protocol should be applied with a specific ethical justification, including transparency, duty to care, duty to steward resources, duty to plan, and distributive justice.

conclusionsClinical triage decisions based on clinical judgment alone are prone to inconsistent application by triage officers in a pandemic. An ethical framework can inform decision-making and improve accountability. It remains difficult to connect clinical criteria and ethical criteria, because of the models on offer for health services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareEmergenciesHumansPublic HealthResource AllocationTriage

Identifiers

PMID33525236
PMCPMC7927504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.