Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33525224›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2020

Medicine and humanism in the time of COVID-19. Ethical choices.

Marco Doldi, Andrea Moscatelli, Angelo Ravelli, Raffaele Spiazzi, Paolo Petralia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco DoldiFacoltà Teologica dell'Italia Settentrionale, Sezione di Genova, Genoa, Italy. dm.doldi@gmail.com.
Andrea MoscatelliIRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Centro di Terapia intensiva Neonatale e Pediatrica, Dipartimento Integrato di Alta Intensità di Cura e Chirurgia, Genoa, Italy. andreamoscatelli@gaslini.org.
Angelo RavelliIRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, and Università degli Studi di Genova, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno-Infantili (DiNOGMI), Genoa, Italy.. angeloravelli@gaslini.org.
Raffaele SpiazziIRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Direzione Sanitaria, Genoa, Italy. raffaelespiazzi@gaslini.org.
Paolo PetraliaIRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Direzione Generale, Genoa, Italy. paolopetralia@gaslini.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has been the most defining event of our era. The world of healthcare has experienced first-hand the dramatic situation of treating patients in the face of the dangers of contagion and limited resources. Difficult choices have everywhere been made alongside ethical reflection. Now that, at least in our part of the world, viral infection seems to be broadly on the decline, there is an urgent need for fresh, anthropological, ethical reflection. It is important to avoid being unprepared in the event of further occasions, but above all, to now think in global terms. This is because the pandemic has forced us to recognise the urgency of building alliance in healthcare and a balanced relationship with the environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ethics, MedicalHumanismBioethical IssuesForecastingHumans

Identifiers

PMID33525224
PMCPMC7927485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.