Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33524155›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Human pathways in animal models: possibilities and limitations.

Nadezhda T Doncheva, Oana Palasca, Reza Yarani, Thomas Litman, Christian Anthon, Martien A M Groenen, Peter F Stadler, Flemming Pociot, Lars J Jensen, Jan Gorodkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Special Issue "Using Model Organisms to Study Complex Human Diseases".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Application and Challenges of Using ProbioticDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 7 countries.

Nadezhda T DonchevaCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Oana PalascaCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Reza YaraniTranslational Type 1 Diabetes Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark.
Thomas LitmanDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian AnthonCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Martien A M GroenenAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter F StadlerCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Flemming PociotCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Lars J JensenCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Jan GorodkinCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models are crucial for advancing our knowledge about the molecular pathways involved in human diseases. However, it remains unclear to what extent tissue expression of pathways in healthy individuals is conserved between species. In addition, organism-specific information on pathways in animal models is often lacking. Within these limitations, we explore the possibilities that arise from publicly available data for the animal models mouse, rat, and pig. We approximate the animal pathways activity by integrating the human counterparts of curated pathways with tissue expression data from the models. Specifically, we compare whether the animal orthologs of the human genes are expressed in the same tissue. This is complicated by the lower coverage and worse quality of data in rat and pig as compared to mouse. Despite that, from 203 human KEGG pathways and the seven tissues with best experimental coverage, we identify 95 distinct pathways, for which the tissue expression in one animal model agrees better with human than the others. Our systematic pathway-tissue comparison between human and three animal modes points to specific similarities with human and to distinct differences among the animal models, thereby suggesting the most suitable organism for modeling a human pathway or tissue.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsGene ExpressionGenomeHumansMiceOrgan SpecificityProtein Interaction MappingRatsSwine

Identifiers

PMID33524155
PMCPMC7913694
OpenAlexW3127586962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.