ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2021
Archaeal tyrosine recombinases.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ecological and evolutionary implications of a mobile genetic element-rich haloarchaeon with unique osmotic resilience.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
- How and when organisms edit their own genomes.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Provirus deletion frommicroLife · 2025Article
- Systematic identification of cargo-mobilizing genetic elements reveals new dimensions of eukaryotic diversity.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Viruses of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Generating a Small Shuttle Vector for Effective Genetic Engineering ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of mobile genetic elements into their host chromosome influences the immediate fate of cellular organisms and gradually shapes their evolution. Site-specific recombinases catalyzing this integration have been extensively characterized both in bacteria and eukarya. More recently, a number of reports provided the in-depth characterization of archaeal tyrosine recombinases and highlighted new particular features not observed in the other two domains. In addition to being active in extreme environments, archaeal integrases catalyze reactions beyond site-specific recombination. Some of these integrases can catalyze low-sequence specificity recombination reactions with the same outcome as homologous recombination events generating deep rearrangements of their host genome. A large proportion of archaeal integrases are termed suicidal due to the presence of a specific recombination target within their own gene. The paradoxical maintenance of integrases that disrupt their gene upon integration implies novel mechanisms for their evolution. In this review, we assess the diversity of the archaeal tyrosine recombinases using a phylogenomic analysis based on an exhaustive similarity network. We outline the biochemical, ecological and evolutionary properties of these enzymes in the context of the families we identified and emphasize similarities and differences between archaeal recombinases and their bacterial and eukaryal counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.