Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33523947›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Evolution of forelimb musculoskeletal function across the fish-to-tetrapod transition.

J L Molnar, J R Hutchinson, R Diogo, J A Clack, S E Pierce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Soft tissue constraints on joint mobility in the avian shoulder.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Evolution of Ultraconserved Elements in Vertebrates.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J L MolnarAnatomy Department, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Northern Boulevard, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA. julia.molnar@nyit.edu spierce@oeb.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1455-0487
J R HutchinsonStructure & Motion Laboratory, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-7038
R DiogoAnatomy Department, Howard University College of Medicine, 520 W St. NW, Numa Adams Building, Washington, DC 20059, USA.
J A ClackUniversity Museum of Zoology, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
S E PierceMuseum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. julia.molnar@nyit.edu spierce@oeb.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-1841
Harvard University · USHoward University · USNew York Institute of Technology · USRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most intriguing questions in vertebrate evolution is how tetrapods gained the ability to walk on land. Although many hypotheses have been proposed, few have been rigorously tested using the fossil record. Here, we build three-dimensional musculoskeletal models of the pectoral appendage in

Identifiers

PMID33523947
PMCPMC10964964
OpenAlexW3121769929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.