ArticleScience advances2021
Optical selection and sorting of nanoparticles according to quantum mechanical properties.
Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemical Modulation of Optical Forces for Dynamic Light-Driven Materials.ACS photonics · 2026Article
- Chirality-selective optical transport of nanoparticles in the evanescent field of a nanofibre.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Harnessing Microfluidics for the Effective and Precise Synthesis of Advanced Materials.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Evolution of coherent vibrations in atomically precise gold quantum rods with periodic elongation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Safety Landscape of Therapeutic Nanozymes and Future Research Directions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Particle trapping with optical nanofibers: a review [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Gaining control on optical force by the stimulated-emission resonance effect.Chemical science · 2023Article
- 1 nm-Resolution Sorting of Sub-10 nm Nanoparticles Using a Dielectric Metasurface with Toroidal Responses.Small science · 2023Article
- Evanescent field trapping and propulsion of Janus particles along optical nanofibers.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Biosensors for the Detection of Viral Nucleic Acids: An Overview.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Sorting Gold and Sand (Silica) Using Atomic Force Microscope-Based Dielectrophoresis.Nano-micro letters · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical trapping and manipulation have been widely applied to biological systems, and their cutting-edge techniques are creating current trends in nanomaterial sciences. The resonant absorption of materials induces not only the energy transfer from photons to quantum mechanical motion of electrons but also the momentum transfer between them, resulting in dissipative optical forces that drive the macroscopic mechanical motion of the particles. However, optical manipulation, according to the quantum mechanical properties of individual nanoparticles, is still challenging. Here, we demonstrate selective transportation of nanodiamonds with and without nitrogen-vacancy centers by balancing resonant absorption and scattering forces induced by two different-colored lasers counterpropagating along a nanofiber. Furthermore, we propose a methodology for precisely determining the absorption cross sections for single nanoparticles by monitoring the optically driven motion, which is called as "optical force spectroscopy." This method provides a novel direction in optical manipulation technology toward development of functional nanomaterials and quantum devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.