Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33523735›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2021

Institutions For Mental Diseases Medicaid Waivers: Impact On Payments For Substance Use Treatment Facilities.

Johanna Catherine Maclean, Hefei Wen, Kosali I Simon, Brendan Saloner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evictions and psychiatric treatment.Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna Catherine MacleanJohanna Catherine Maclean (catherine.maclean@temple.edu) is an associate professor of economics at Temple University, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts; and a research affiliate at the Institute of Labor Economics in Bonn, Germany.
Hefei WenHefei Wen is an assistant professor in the Division of Health Policy and Insurance Research, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, in Boston, Massachusetts.
Kosali I SimonKosali I. Simon is the Herman B. Wells Endowed Professor at the Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs and associate vice provost for health sciences, Indiana University, in Bloomington, Indiana.
Brendan SalonerBrendan Saloner is the Bloomberg Associate Professor of American Health in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Improving Access and Quality of care for Medicaid-Eligible Adults with Opioid Use DisorderK01DA042139 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALONER, BRENDAN K · 2017 to 2021
$917k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA042139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Institutions for Mental Diseases (IMD) exclusion prohibits use of federal Medicaid funds to treat enrollees ages 21-64 in psychiatric residential treatment facilities that have more than sixteen beds. In 2015 the federal government created a streamlined application pathway for state waivers of this rule to allow Medicaid coverage for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in residential facilities. Nine states received IMD waivers during the period 2015-18. Using data from the 2010-18 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services, we examined changes in residential and outpatient SUD treatment facilities' acceptance of Medicaid and other types of health coverage, as well as self-pay arrangements and provision of charity care, after states' adoption of IMD waivers. Acceptance of Medicaid increased 34 percent at residential treatment facilities and 9 percent at intensive outpatient facilities two years after waiver implementation. Delivery of medications for opioid use disorder did not increase in residential facilities post waiver but did increase to some extent in outpatient facilities. Our findings suggest that IMD waivers may be an important tool for advancing access to a full continuum of SUD treatment for Medicaid enrollees.

Indexed as

MedicaidOpioid-Related DisordersAdultFederal GovernmentHumansMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33523735
PMCPMC10161239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.