ArticleThe oncologist2021
Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Central Nervous System Malignancies.
Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relevant pharmacologic interactions in the concurrent management of brain tumor-related epilepsy and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment Algorithm in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Updated Canadian Expert Consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Pooled it
- Disease-specific safety and efficacy of DOACs vs LMWH for CAT in patients with brain metastases: a real-world analysis.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Performance of Bleeding Risk Scores for Major Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: Insights from the CURES Registry-2.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Anticoagulants in hematologic malignancies: what is the data?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Glioblastoma in adults: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Clinical Challenges in Treating Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Clinically Oriented Review.Acta haematologica · 2025Review
- Anticoagulant prescribing patterns in patients with primary central nervous system malignancies and secondary metastases.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Article
- Abelacimab in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: The Right Drug at the Right Time for the Right Purpose. A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Epidemiology, biology, and management of venous thromboembolism in gliomas: An interdisciplinary review.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- DOACs in patients with brain cancers: promising but still a long way to go.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Antithrombotic strategy in cancer patients comorbid with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Intra-and peritumoral hemorrhage in the meningioma of a nonagenarian due to administration of direct oral anticoagulants after mechanical thrombectomy.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants vs low molecular weight heparin in glioblastoma: A retrospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary Care for the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT): Impact of Educational Interventions on CAT-Related Events and on Patients' and Clinicians' Awareness.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19.The Lancet. Oncology · 2022Review
- Venous Thrombotic Events and Anticoagulation in Brain Tumor Patients.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with brain tumors are at high risk for thromboembolic complications and frequently require anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a less burdensome treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis with safety and efficacy comparable to those of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH); however, there are few data to support the use of DOACs in patients with brain tumors. The purpose of this study was to better understand the safety profile of anticoagulants in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors, with particular interest in the safety and efficacy of DOACs. Our hypothesis was that DOACs are as safe and effective as LWMH in this population. This study was conducted through a single-center retrospective chart review of 125 patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors on anticoagulation. Our primary outcomes were major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), with secondary outcomes of minor bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. The rate of major bleeding was 26% in the LMWH group versus 9.6% in the DOAC group (p = .03). The rate of ICH was 15% in the LMWH group versus 5.8% in the DOAC group (p = .09). The severity of ICH in both groups was low with median Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 scores of 2 in the LMWH group and 3 in the DOAC group. The rates of minor bleeding and recurrent thrombosis were low in both groups. Our conclusion is that DOAC use in patients with brain tumors is not associated with increased rates of major bleeding compared with LMWH and is a safe and effective option. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients with brain tumors are at high risk for venous thromboembolism and frequently require anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are less burdensome than low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of thromboembolism, but there is concern in the community over increased risk of bleeding. This study provides much-needed objective evidence that there are fewer major bleeding events in patients with brain tumors on DOACs compared to LMWH with similar efficacy. As the paradigm of anticoagulation in patients with cancer shifts from LWMH toward DOACs, this work is particularly meaningful as it suggests DOACs are safe and effective for patients with brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.