Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33523319›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Efficacy and acceptability of the S1P receptor in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis.

Jingyi Tong, Qin Zou, Yongmin Chen, Xiaoping Liao, Rong Chen, Lin Ma, Daqi Zhang, Qifu Li

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingyi TongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China.
Qin ZouDepartment of Psychology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China.
Yongmin ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoping LiaoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China.
Rong ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China.
Lin MaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China.
Daqi ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China. daqizhang2010@163.com.
Qifu LiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570100, People's Republic of China. lee-chief@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-410X
Hainan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors are extensively used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the optimal therapeutic role of S1P in MS patients has still remained elusive. This network meta-analysis (NMA) systematically evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of S1P receptors, as disease-modifying drugs, in the treatment of patients with MS, so as to find out the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and provide a reliable basis for the prescription of S1P drugs for patients with MS.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and NMA to compare the efficacy and acceptability of S1P receptors for treating MS patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were published until May 2020, were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The primary outcome in this study was the treatment efficacy for the S1P receptor for MS patients, in terms of decrease in annualized relapse rate. The secondary outcomes were adverse events leading to discontinuation of a study, such as an unfavorable or unintended sign/symptom. Outcomes were appraised using a random effects model expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, and were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities for hierarchical clustering of interventions.

resultsA total of 13 RCTS were included, which enrolled 10,554 patients. The results of NMA showed that Fingolimod, Laquinimod, Siponimod, Ozanimod, Amiselimod, and Ponesimod were superior to placebo in terms of reducing the annualized relapse rate of MS patients. Regarding efficacy, the best and worst treatments were Amiselimod (0.4 mg; SUCRA 8.1%) and placebo (SUCRA 90.5%), respectively. As for acceptability, the best and worst interventions were Ozanimod (1 mg; SUCRA 20.4%) and Ponesimod (40 mg; SUCRA 96.0%), respectively. The comparison-adjusted funnel plots of annualized relapse rate and side effects in the included studies revealed that there was no significant funnel plot asymmetry

conclusionsThis NMA indicated that Amiselimod (0.4 mg) is the most effective treatment strategy as a S1P receptor for MS patients. However, the abovementioned findings need to be further confirmed in the next researches.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalHumansSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsTreatment OutcomeSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsMultiple sclerosisNetwork meta-analysisS1P receptorsTreatment acceptabilityTreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID33523319
PMCPMC8043952
OpenAlexW3126526370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.