SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021
Efficacy and acceptability of the S1P receptor in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk for Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated With Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of 15 Randomised Controlled Trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Unraveling multiple sclerosis: a hidden interaction between intestinal microbiota and host lipid metabolism.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Altered Lipid Metabolism in CNS Demyelination and Remyelination Are Key Elements Driving Progressive MS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 modulators exert neuroprotective effects in central nervous system disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Clinicians' Preferences for Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Clinical Management Considerations: A Choice Experiment.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Potential adverse events associated with sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators in patients with multiple sclerosis: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Enhanced Activation of the S1PR2-IL-1β-Src-BDNF-TrkB Pathway Mediates Neuroinflammation in the Hippocampus and Cognitive Impairment in Hyperammonemic Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of Pharmacological Therapies in Relapse Rates in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Cureus · 2023Review
- Review
- Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of siponimod in the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in Italy.PloS one · 2022Article
- New Insights into Multiple Sclerosis Mechanisms: Lipids on the Track to Control Inflammation and Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- An Overview of the Efficacy and Safety of Ozanimod for the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors are extensively used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the optimal therapeutic role of S1P in MS patients has still remained elusive. This network meta-analysis (NMA) systematically evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of S1P receptors, as disease-modifying drugs, in the treatment of patients with MS, so as to find out the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and provide a reliable basis for the prescription of S1P drugs for patients with MS.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and NMA to compare the efficacy and acceptability of S1P receptors for treating MS patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were published until May 2020, were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The primary outcome in this study was the treatment efficacy for the S1P receptor for MS patients, in terms of decrease in annualized relapse rate. The secondary outcomes were adverse events leading to discontinuation of a study, such as an unfavorable or unintended sign/symptom. Outcomes were appraised using a random effects model expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, and were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities for hierarchical clustering of interventions.
resultsA total of 13 RCTS were included, which enrolled 10,554 patients. The results of NMA showed that Fingolimod, Laquinimod, Siponimod, Ozanimod, Amiselimod, and Ponesimod were superior to placebo in terms of reducing the annualized relapse rate of MS patients. Regarding efficacy, the best and worst treatments were Amiselimod (0.4 mg; SUCRA 8.1%) and placebo (SUCRA 90.5%), respectively. As for acceptability, the best and worst interventions were Ozanimod (1 mg; SUCRA 20.4%) and Ponesimod (40 mg; SUCRA 96.0%), respectively. The comparison-adjusted funnel plots of annualized relapse rate and side effects in the included studies revealed that there was no significant funnel plot asymmetry
conclusionsThis NMA indicated that Amiselimod (0.4 mg) is the most effective treatment strategy as a S1P receptor for MS patients. However, the abovementioned findings need to be further confirmed in the next researches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.