Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33523299›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021

New-onset seizures after cranioplasty-a different view on a putatively frequently observed phenomenon.

Dorian Hirschmann, Beate Kranawetter, Matthias Tomschik, Jonathan Wais, Fabian Winter, Josa M Frischer, Matthias Millesi, Johannes Herta, Karl Roessler, Christian Dorfer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complications of Alloplastic Graft Materials Used in Cranioplasty: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dorian HirschmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Beate KranawetterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias TomschikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jonathan WaisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian WinterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Josa M FrischerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias MillesiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes HertaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Karl RoesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christian DorferDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. christian.dorfer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew-onset seizures after cranioplasty (NOSAC) are reported to be a frequent complication of cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). There are considerable differences in the incidence of NOSAC and contradictory data about presumed risk factors in the literature. We suggest NOSAC to be a consequence of patients' initial condition which led to DHC, rather than a complication of subsequent CP. We conducted a retrospective analysis to verify our hypothesis.

methodsThe medical records of all patients ≥ 18 years who underwent CP between 2002 and 2017 at our institution were evaluated including incidence of seizures, time of seizure onset, and presumed risk factors. Indication for DHC, type of implant used, timing of CP, patient age, presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt), and postoperative complications were compared between patients with and without NOSAC.

resultsA total of 302 patients underwent CP between 2002 and 2017, 276 of whom were included in the outcome analysis and the incidence of NOSAC was 23.2%. Although time between DHC and CP differed significantly between DHC indication groups, time between DHC and seizure onset did not differ, suggesting the occurrence of seizures to be independent of the procedure of CP. Time of follow-up was the only factor associated with the occurrence of NOSAC.

conclusionNew-onset seizures may be a consequence of the initial condition leading to DHC rather than of CP itself. Time of follow-up seems to play a major role in detection of new-onset seizures.

Indexed as

AdultDecompressive CraniectomyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSeizuresSkullVentriculoperitoneal ShuntCranioplastyFollow-upRisk factorsSeizures

Identifiers

PMID33523299
PMCPMC8053646
OpenAlexW3128534619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.