ArticleBrain structure & function2021
A comparison of diffusion tractography techniques in simulating the generalized Ising model to predict the intrinsic activity of the brain.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion tractography is a non-invasive technique that is being used to estimate the location and direction of white matter tracts in the brain. Identifying the characteristics of white matter plays an important role in research as well as in clinical practice that relies on finding the relationship between the structure and function of the brain. An Ising model implemented on a structural connectivity (SC) has proven to explain the spontaneous fluctuations in the brain at criticality using brain's structure depicted by white matter tracts. Since the SC is the only input of the model, identifying the tractography technique which provides a SC that delivers the highest prediction of the brain's intrinsic activity via the generalized Ising model (GIM) is essential. Hence an Ising model is simulated on SCs generated using two different acquisition schemes (single and multi-shell) and two different tractography approaches (deterministic and probabilistic) and analyzed at criticality across 69 healthy subjects. Results showed that by introducing the GIM, predictability of the empirical correlation matrix increases on average from 0.2 to 0.6 compared to the predictability using the empirical connectivity matrix directly. It is also observed that the SC generated using deterministic tractography without fractional anisotropy resulted in the highest correlation coefficient value of 0.65 between the simulated and empirical correlation matrices. Additionally, calculated dimensionalities per simulation illustrated that the dimensionality depends upon the method of tractography that has been used to extract the SC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.