Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33523276›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: outcomes from a United States experience.

Nina Gupta, Gabriela Rodríguez-Ruiz, Uzma D Siddiqui, Christopher G Chapman, Kianoush Donboli, John Hart, Shu-Yuan Xiao, Irving Waxman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Advances in endoscopic diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina GuptaCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. ngupta9@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-295X
Gabriela Rodríguez-RuizHospital Central Norte Petróleos Mexicanos, Mexico City, Mexico.
Uzma D SiddiquiCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher G ChapmanCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kianoush DonboliCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
John HartDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shu-Yuan XiaoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Irving WaxmanCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USPemex (Mexico) · MX

Funding

ULTRASTRUCTURE AND CYTOMORPHOLOGY COREP30DK042086 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHANG, EUGENE B · 1990 to 2025
$29.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is commonly used in Asia for resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) and early (T1) colorectal cancers. It allows for en bloc removal and is often curative. We describe outcomes of colorectal ESD from a United States (US) academic medical center and compare this to international experiences.

methodsRetrospective review was performed of colonic lesions referred to the University of Chicago Medical Center for ESD from 2012 to 2020. Clinical and procedural data were collected.

resultsThe study included 78 lesions with mean size of 29.7 mm (range 10-100 mm). The overall en bloc resection rate was 73.1% (n = 57). Between the first and second half of the study, it improved from 61.5 to 84.6% (p = 0.02). Histology showed adenocarcinoma in fifteen lesions (19.2%). Of all neoplastic lesions (n = 68), resection with negative margins (R0) was achieved in 54 cases (79.4%). Adverse events occurred in 9 cases (11.5%), but most (n = 6, 66.7%) were successfully treated endoscopically. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 46 patients (59.0%) at a mean interval of 6.8 months (SD ± 5.0 months) with two case of recurrent lesion (4.3%).

conclusionsThis study shows successful colorectal ESD outcomes at a US tertiary center. The en bloc resection rate was lower than other cohorts, but a learning curve was demonstrated. The R0 resection, lesion recurrence, and adverse event rates were similar to other non-Asian experiences, but not as favorable as in Asia [Fuccio et al. in Gastrointest Endosc 86:74-86.e17, 2017]. Increased ESD training in the US can help optimize utilization and outcomes.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColorectal NeoplasmsEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionHumansLearning CurveRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesColorectal cancerColorectal polypEndoscopic submucosal dissectionTherapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID33523276
OpenAlexW3128367013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.