ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021
[Apps and web-based interventions for prostate cancer follow-up-a scoping review].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSide effects due to prostate cancer therapy and psychosocial strain are not always recognised during follow-up, which may result in the absence of appropriate therapy offers. Recent studies have shown a potential for improving care by integrating digital technologies like smartphone apps.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to explore the effects of apps for the assessment of side effects and distress, provision of individualised patient information and management of prostate cancer follow-up on patient outcome. Furthermore, findings on user acceptance and recommendations for implementation and evaluation were identified.
methodsThe databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PSYNDEX, wiso and SpringerLink were searched for quantitative and qualitative primary studies from the period 2005 until August 2020.
resultsIn all, 22 studies were included in the review. Apps and web-based interventions had a positive effect on physical symptoms, psychosocial distress and participation in treatment. User acceptance was predominantly good, but there were still substantial numbers of non-users.
conclusionsApps and web-based interventions can be an effective supplement to follow-up care, especially if they are adapted to individual patient needs. Robust evidence is still lacking. There is a need for larger randomised controlled studies, particularly in the German healthcare setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33523240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.